Advanced Search Results
H.K. Das Vs. Babulal Gangaram Joshi
Gujarat
Dec-30-1999
Trusts and SocietiesLabour and Industrial
(2001)2GLR175; (2001)IILLJ460Guj
Girish D. Bhatt
J.N. Bhatt, J.1. In this group of petitions, common questions have arisen out of a common award and, therefore, upon request, they are being disposed of, simultaneously.2. A few skeleton projection of facts leading to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhatt Indravadan Nathalal Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Feb-11-2004
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 9, 50 and 52; Gujarat Municipalities Act - Sections 2(22), 65(2), 69, 80, 80(2), 146, 147, 148 and 258; Bombay District Municipal Act; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 52; Legislatures vide Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992; General Act; Constitution of India - Articles 243P to 243ZG and 254; Land Acquisition Act, 1864
(2004)2GLR1365
M.C. Bhatt,; P.R. Nanavati,; A.J. Shastri and;
K.A. Puj, J.1. Since common issue is involved in all these matters, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. In Special Civil Application No. 4716 of 2002, there are in all 11 petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayandas Kedarnath Daga Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-29-1963
Civil
(1964)66BOMLR17
Patel, J.1. His Lordship after stating the facts proceeded. As a result of the investigation made by the Special Police, two charge-sheets were filed, one with regard to the case which resulted in the first commitment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
SadruddIn Suleman Jhaveri Vs. J.H. Patwardhan and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-31-1964
Property
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 245, 254(2), 358 and 366(10); Bombay Commissioners of Divisions Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2) and 3(4); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 9, 17(1), 17(3) and 17(4); Bombay Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2), 4 and 6
AIR1965Bom224; (1965)67BOMLR101; ILR1965Bom394; 1965MhLJ290
J.C. Bhatt, ;R.L. Dalal and ;R.J. Bhatt, Advs., i/b., Ambubhai and Diwanji, Attorneys
Kotval, J.(1) In this Special Civil Application there are challenged two Notification under the Land Acquisition Act whereby the land of the petitioner has been taken by the State of Maharashtra the third respondent before us....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.i.T. Vs. Trimurti Builders
Gujarat
Jan-28-2004
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961- Sections 142(1), 143, 143(2), 144, 184, 184(7), 184(8), 185, 185(5), 186, 186(2) and 256(1)
[2004]269ITR225(Guj)
Manish R. Bhatt, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1
A.M. Kapadia, J.1. (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA) 1. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A' ('the Tribunal'...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendrabhai D. Makwana and 4 ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Oct-08-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 113A and 113B; Guardian and Wards Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107, 306 and 498A
(2009)2GLR961
K.K. Pandey, Adv. for Appellants 1 - 5
A.L. Dave, J.1. Lilaben, daughter of complainant Babarbhai Govindbhai Gohil, was married to original accused No. 1 on 31/5/1991. Accused appellant No. 1 and Lilaben were staying at Thanklessly near the house of complainant Babarbhai Govindbhai...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLallubhai Keshavram Joshi Vs. Nirmalaben Lalluram Joshi
Gujarat
Aug-03-1971
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1953 - Sections 23, 24 and 25; Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 24 and 28
AIR1972Guj174; (1972)GLR626
I.C. Bhatt, Adv.
1. This appeal raises a very important question of law. In order to appreciate the implications involved in this appeal it will be worth-while to state the facts giving rise to this appeal in a nut-shell.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVirabala and ors. Vs. Shah Harichand Ratanchand
Gujarat
Jul-10-1972
Family
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 9(1) 4(5) and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21 and 141
AIR1973Guj1; (1973)0GLR88
N.M. Bhatt, Adv.
2. Mr. N. H. Bhatt, leaned Advocate appearing for the appellant has contended that the question of ordinary residence is a question of fact and not a question of presumption. He conceded that the mere face...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Gujarat Vs. N.K. Jadhav
Gujarat
Dec-01-1999
Limitation
Limitation Act - Sections 5; Bombay State Reserved Police Force Act, 1951; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16
(2000)4GLR801
S.N. Shelat, Addl. Adv. General, i/b., Patel Associates in Civil Application Nos. 3056 to 3059 and 3063/98
C.K. Thakkar, Actg. C.J.1. All these applications are filed for condonation of delay in filing LPAs against the order passed by the learned Single Judge .When appeals were filed by the applicants-appellants , the registry raised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHynoup Food and Oil Industries Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Inco ...
Gujarat
Jul-17-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 32A, 34(1), 80HH, 80I, 143(3), 147, 148, 148(1), 148(2) and 234B; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2008)219CTR(Guj)124; [2008]307ITR115(Guj)
J.P. Shah and; S.N. Divetia, Advs.
K.A. Puj, J.1. Since all these petitions are filed by the same Assessee, i.e. Hynoup Food & Oil Industries Limited, and since the common issue regarding reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »