Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr bhat · Page 1 of about 277 results (0.299 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 17 2003

Appaji Vs. M. Krishna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2005)ACC591

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

Tirath S. Thakur, J.1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is directed against a Judgment & Award made by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bangalore Rural District, Bangalore, whereby MVC No. 936/1997 has been allowed in part and a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1964

N.B. Jeejeebhoy Vs. Assistant Collector, Thana Prant, Thana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-05-1964

Subject : Property

Acts : Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 299; Land Acquisition (Bombay Amendment) Act, 1948 - Sections 299(2); Constitution of India - Article 31(5), 31-A and 31-B

Reported in : AIR1965SC1096; (1965)67BOMLR575; 1965MhLJ115(SC); [1965]1SCR636

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

Subba Rao, J. 1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay modifying those of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thana, in a reference arising out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1980

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Vyas Tewari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162

Reported in : AIR1981SC635; 1981CriLJ38; 1980Supp(1)SCC433; 1981(13)LC168(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

R.S. Sakaria and O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.1. We have heard Mr. Bhat, learned Counsel for the appellant State. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent despite service of notice. The impugned judgment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 20 2014

Prinl.Govt.Pre-univ.Col.and anr Vs. Jambu Kumar Mutha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10418 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19634 of 2012) The Principal Govt. Pre-University College & Anr. ...Appellants Vs. Mr. Jambu Kumar Mutha ...Respondent With...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2014

Prinl.Govt.Pre-univ.Col.and anr Vs. Jambu Kumar Mutha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10418 OF2014(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19634 of 2012) The Principal Govt. Pre-University College & Anr. ...Appellants Vs. Mr. Jambu Kumar Mutha ...Respondent With...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2013

State of Jandk; and anr. Vs. M/S K. B. and Co.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-30-2013

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU CIMA no. 103_A of 2011 CMA no. 265 of 2001 State of J&K and anr. Petitioners M/S K. B. and Co. Respondents !Mr. M.A. Bhat, Advocate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2008

Gh. Hassan Marazi Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-03-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ331

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhat

H. Imtiyaz Hussain, J.1. Petitioner Ghulam Hassan Marazi is the General Manager in the Jammu & Kashmir State Forest Corporation. Vide Government Order No. 1077-GAD of 2007 dated 11.9.2007, the Government directed his transfer and attachment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1998

Smt. Parvathamma Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-11-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101, 102 and 103

Reported in : 1999(2)KarLJ224

Advocate for Appellant : Sri N. Shankaranarayana Bhat, Adv.

ORDER1. This writ petition has been very vehemently agitated on a point that is of considerable importance to judicial proceedings. The petitioner before me Parvathamma claims that she is entitled to the grant of occupancy rights...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 1996

Malvika Madan Sehgal and anr. Vs. M.M. Sehgal Limited and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-10-1996

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 2

Reported in : 1997IAD(Delhi)512; [1998]91CompCas133(Delhi); 65(1997)DLT381

Advocate for Appellant : Rajeev Sawhney,; Arjun Pant,; K.N. Bhat,;

Vijender Jain, J. (1) This is an application (CA No. 2784/94 ) filed by the plaintiffs praying, inter alia, that R restraint order be passed against defendant Nos.l to 28 from alienating, transferring, selling, mortgaging or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1998

Smt. Parvathamma Vs. State of Karnataka of ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-11-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 48A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23 Rule 3

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3950

Advocate for Appellant : N. Shankaranarayana Bhat, Adv.

M.F. Saldanha, J.1. This Writ Petition has been very vehemently agitated on a point that is of considerable importance to judicial proceedings. The petitioner before me Parvathamma claims that she is entitled to the grant of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial