Advanced Search Results

Bijoy Sing Deka Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Barman

Oral Order: (Sharma, J) 1. Heard Mr. J.C. Barman, leaned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B.B. Gogoi, learned APP, Assam. I have also perused the entire materials on record. 2. This appeal is directed...

Usha Chatterjee Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : InsuranceContract

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 - Regulations 8, 16(1) and 19

Reported in : 2005(2)CHN11

Advocate for Appellant : Kamalesh Bhattacharyya and ;Biswarup Biswas, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the validity of the order dated 3rd August, 1990 passed by the appellate authority, namely, the Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India.2. By the said order, the...

Helen Deb Vs. Dilip Dey and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Barman, Adv.

A.B. Pal, J.1. Heard Mr. P.R. Barman, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A. Gan Chowdhury, learned counsel for the respondent-New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Mr. R. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent-owner.2. This...

Mohima Ranjan Roy and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 206, 207, 347, 347(1) and 537

Reported in : AIR1967Cal42,1967CriLJ45

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Banerjee and ;Jnanendra Mohan De, Advs.

Sen, J.1. This Rule is directed against the order of Sri M.S. Banerjee, Magistrate, First Class, Burdwan dated 19-1-66 whereby he directed that the trial which was being proceeded against the accused petitioners should be switched...

Binjraj Marwari and ors. Vs. Das Mookerjee and Co. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1929Cal659

Rankin, C.J.1. In my opinion, this appeal must be allowed.2. It appears that certain persons were owners of a colliery. One of those persons brought a suit for dissolution of partnership and the usual ancillary reliefs....

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23); Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Ms. M. Deb Roy and Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Shri Chitta Ranjan Saha Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 - Sections 3

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Bhattacharjee, Senior Adv. and A.K. Bhowmik, Adv.

B.P. Saraf, J.1. The question that arises for determination in this writ petition is whether 'pea-gravels' supplied by the petitioner falls within the category of goods described as 'metals, stone chips, any other products or sub-products...

Sajjan Singh Vs. Smt. Jamuna Bala Devi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104

Reported in : AIR1960All410

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Barman, Adv.

S.S. Dhavan, J. 1. This is a tenant's second appeal against a decree for ejectment. The appellant Sajjan Singh was the tenant of Smt. Jamini Bala Devi. The parties live in Mathura and the house in...

Pradip Kumar Das Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 - Rules 11, 14, 14 (1) and (3) to (23);; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rule 16(1);; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Roy Barman, ;Ms. M. Deb Roy and ;Mr. B. Saha, Advs.

ORDER1. Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned counsel for petitioner. Also heard Mr. U.B. Saha, learned senior Govt. Advocate, assisted by Mr. J. Majumdar, learned counsel the respondents.2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of...

Hanuman Pd. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 17

Advocate for Appellant : H.P. Barman, Adv.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, praying, for setting aside the order, dated 19.8.1998 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati, in Application...