Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr barik · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2008

State of Orissa Vs. Manoj Kumar Nayak

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-16-2008

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ23

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rao

ORDERPradip Mohanty, J.1. The judgment dated 24.03.2007 of the Addl. Sessions Judge (FTC), Baripada in Criminal Revision No. 3/ 29 of 2006 directing release of the seized Hero Honda Motorcycle and the mobile handset by setting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

Ashok Kumar Panda Vs. State Project Director, O.P.E.P.A.-cum-director ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(1)OLR391

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Barik

ORDERN. Prusty, J.1. The petitioner, who was one of the applicants for his engagement as Sikhya Sahayak under Pattamundai Block in the district of Kendrapara, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the opposite...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

Ashok Kumar Panda Vs. State Project Director, O.P.E.P.A.-cum-director, ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT544

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Barik

ORDERN. Prusty, J.1. The Petitioner, who was one of the applicants for his engagement as Sikhya Sahayak under Pattamundai Block in the district of Kendrapara, has filed this Writ Petition for a direction to the Opposite...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 09 2005

Union of India (Uoi) Represented Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Su ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Feb-09-2005

Subject : Service

Reported in : 99(2005)CLT639

Advocate for Appellant : P.R. Barik, A.S.C. (Central)

I.M. Quddusi, J.The petitioners, Union of India and Ors. have filed this Writ Application against the Order dated 7.1.2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 177 of 2001 by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1992

Chaitana Majhi and ors. Vs. Palu Majhi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-16-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : 1993(I)OLR196

Advocate for Appellant : M. Patra, U.S. Patnaik, D. Patra, B. Brahamachari and Manoranjan Patra

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Refusal of prayer of petitioners to be added as parties to the suit is grievance of petitioners in this Civil Revision.2. When the Civil Revision was listed for admission on 28-11-1990, I found...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2008

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Khulana Sundari Nayak and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-15-2008

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR588

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.R. Barik

ORDERA.K. Parichha, J.1. Learned Counsels for the parties are present. With their consent, the appeal is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. The following substantial question of law is canvassed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2009

Bajaranglal Lacha Vs. Maniklal Bhattar and 2 ors. and Shyam Sundar Bha ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Oct-29-2009

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2009(II)OLR980

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P.R. Barik

ORDERM.M. Das, J.1. Heard Mr. P.R. Barik learned Counsel for the appellant.2. This Second Appeal has been filed against the confirming judgment in a suit filed by the respondents 1, 2 and 3. The suit was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2010

M/S. Indian Cable Net Company Ltd. Versus M/S. Economic Entertainment ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : May-21-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: YOGINDER HANDOO, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: NAVIN CHAWLA, SHARATH SAMPATH, ADVOCATES.

S.B. SINHA The petitioner is a multiservice operator having its head-ends all over India. The first respondent is a local cable operator. They entered into a subscription agreement in or about March, 2006 for a period...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial