Advanced Search Results
Pritam Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Supreme Court of India
Apr-01-1981
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 324, 304
1981Supp(1)SCC49
Mr. Bana
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, J.1. The appellant in this appeal by special leave was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. He was also convicted under Section 324...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJwala Devi Vs. Sub-inspector Bhoop Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1989
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR1989SC1441; 1989CriLJ1459; 1989(2)Crimes257(SC); JT1989(2)SC586; 1989(1)SCALE1562; 1989Supp(1)SCC558
Mr. Bana
ORDERRanganath Misra, J.1. This is an application under Article 136 of the Constitution and is directed against the order of the Delhi High Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 370 of of 1987 dismissing it by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeram Ali Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Oct-24-1977
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 235(2)
AIR1978SC35; 1978CriLJ177; (1977)4SCC433; 1977(9)LC729(SC)
Mr. Bana
S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death for causing the death of his brother's widow, Smt. Nazira. Special leave was granted by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Babu Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-08-1987
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Section 302
1987Supp(1)SCC147
Mr. Bana
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, J.1. The appellant in this appeal by special leave was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. He was also convicted under Section 324...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs. Sone Aggarwal (Minor) Through R.C. Aggarwal Vs. University of Delh ...
Supreme Court of India
Jul-30-1987
Constitution
1988(Supp)SCC548
Ranganath Misra and; M.M. Dutt, JJ.1. Heard Mr Bana for the petitioner and Mr Rao for the Delhi University. The petitioner had applied for admission to the MBBS course of the Delhi University for the session...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMulchandani Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. Vs. the Workmen
Supreme Court of India
Jan-24-1975
Labour and Industrial
AIR1975SC2125; [1975(30)FLR169]; 1975LabIC1508; (1975)ILLJ391SC; (1975)4SCC731; 1975(7)LC161(SC)
A.C. Gupta, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the Award made on August 9, 1973 by the Fifth Labour Court at Bombay deciding some of the issues arising for consideration in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanti Devi. Vs. State of Rajasthan.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-05-2012
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), (IPC) 1860 - Sections 302, 201
Mr. Ravindra Bana
Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The first accused is the appellant. The challenge is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dated 16.02.2005 passed in Criminal Appeal No.517...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsean Trading Agency Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-26-1991
Excise
(1991)LC707Tri(Delhi)
1. M/s. Asean Trading Agency, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) imported nine consignments of Glyoxal Solution 40% and filed nine Bills of Entry on 23-12-1987 for their clearance. The goods were described as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPreet Chattons Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-21-1995
Customs
(1997)LC767Tri(Delhi)
1. All these appeals have been filed against the various orders of Collector of Customs, Bombay [involving] a common factual background.The appellants herein imported various consignments of metallic chains and brass fittings which were declared in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSha Harakchand Dharmaji Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-26-1996
Land Acquisition
(1996)(88)ELT764Tri(Chennai)
1. The present appeal is directed against the order of CC (Appeals) Madras, dated 10-11-1995. In terms of that order, he did not extend the benefit of Notification 45/94, dated 1-3-1994. The short point that arises...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »