Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr b d mandhyan · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.071 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 13 1993

Gulshan Kumar Vs. the Collector, Ghaziabad and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-13-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 17; Procedure of High Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 191 and 193; Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409; Indian Oaths Act, 1872

Reported in : AIR1994All243

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Mandhyan and ;Smt. P.I. Sawhney, Advs.

ORDERRavi S. Dhavan, J.1. By this petition, and the facts averred in it, the Court was led to pass an ad interim order on 21 September, 1993, as the petitioner had contended that therecovery certificate, issued...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1998

Abdul Azeem Vs. Manager (Prabandhak) Madrasa Jamia Miftahul Uloom, Mau ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-11-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recognition of Non-Governmental Arabian and Persian School Rules, 1987 - Rule 34

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC2369

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.A. Kazmi, ;J.A. Azmi, ;R.S. Rao, ;B.D. Mandhyan and ;A.C. Tewari, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order of suspension dated 6.1.1992 which was held to be illegal by the Inspector, Arabic Madrasa, U. P. Allahabad in his order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2007

A.R.C. Overseas Private Limited Vs. Bougainvillea Multiplex and Entert ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : ArbitrationProperty

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1212

Amitava Lala, J.1. By consent of the parties the appeal is heard on the informal papers being the complete set of the context as per the requirement.2. This appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 15 2000

Kanhaiya Lal (Decd.) Through Lrs Vs. Sri Raj NaraIn SarIn (Decd.) Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-15-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order X

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2206

Advocate for Appellant : G.N. Verma, ;P.K. Jain, ;A.N. Verma and ;H.M.B. Sinha, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J. 1. This appeal arises out of an order of rejection of a plaint under Order VII, Rule 11, passed by the learned Civil Judge. Agra in Suit No. 499 of 1990, on 23rd...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1999

Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi Vs. Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Vara ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-22-1999

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 20, 54 and 174; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 140

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1389

Advocate for Appellant : Gyan Chandra Dwivedi, Adv.

S.L. Saraf, J. 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi has sought a direction against respondent No. 3 to pay the annual value of the building as assessed in accordance with Section 174...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1999

Arvind Kumar Vs. Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Luckno ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-02-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 16 and 21; Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975 - Rules 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Agriculture Produce Market Committee (Centralised Service) Regulations, 1984 - Regulations 11, 14, 15, 16 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6H and 10; Rent Control and Eviction Act - Sections 7, 7A and 7(2)

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC1638; (1999)2UPLBEC1040

Advocate for Appellant : Mahesh Gautam, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner wasappointed on 4th May, 1991 on dailywage basis for a period of 30 days.Subsequently, the Deputy Director ofAdministration directed the Secretary,Mandi Samity, Bareilly to appoint thepetitioner as Typist on a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2000

Rayeen Fruit Company and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-22-2000

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 7 (2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2001

Advocate for Appellant : Ashish Kumar Singh and ;Ravi Kiran Jain, Advs.

Shyamal Kumar Sen, A.C.J. 1. Theshort facts involved in this writ petition, inter alia, are that the petitioners are engaged in wholesale business of fruits and vegetables situate at Subzi Mandi. Bahadurganj, Shahjahanpur. It has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1994

Vijay and ors. Vs. Laxmi Chand JaIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-05-1994

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1995)ACC165

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. These three appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act) arise out of a common award under Section 110-B of the Act, one by claimants,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2000

Sudhir Kumar Vs. State of U. P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-27-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Orders 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1; U.P. Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam, 1961 - Sections 117, 237 and 239; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC30; (2001)1UPLBEC237

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.D. Mandhyan, ;Mr. Dinkar Mani Tripathi, ;Mr. Hussain Khan, Advs.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the trial court dated 4.5.2000 rejecting the application of the appellant seeking injunction restraining the defendant-respondents from interfering in realising toll tax in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial