Advanced Search Results

Asharfi Yadav. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - sections 20 (C), 22(C), 23(C), 42, 52A, 55, 57

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar; Mrs. Jyotsana; Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advs.

1. The sole appellant, Asharfi Yadav has been charged under sections 20 (C), 22 (C) and 23 (C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the "N.D.P.S. Act" for short)...

Union of India vs.vodafone Group Plc United Kingdom & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 383/2017 & I.A.No.9460/2017 UNION OF INDIA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Ms. Adrija Thakur,...

Peoples Union For Civil Liberties Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : PAREKH & CO. __ AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE

2023INSC833 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 1255 of 1999 People’s Union for Civil Liberties & Anr .... Appellant(s) Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors ....Respondent(s) WITH Criminal...

All India Judges Association Vs. Union Of India .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI __

1 2024 INSC26Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/INHERENT/EXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 643 of 2015 All India Judges Association … Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors … Respondents With Special...

Ozone Spa Private Limited Vs. Pure Fitness and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:29. h July, 2015 % + CS(OS) No.1815/2015 OZONE SPA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv., Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,...

Mohd.muslim Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh(now Uttarakhand)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : S. S. NEHRA __ JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1089 OF2011MOHD. MUSLIM …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (NOW UTTARAKHAND) …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Heard Mr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, learned advocate...

M/s Sitaram Enterprises Vs. Prithviraj Vardichand Jain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contempt of Court

Advocate for Appellant : RAJEEV MAHESHWARANAND ROY __

‘REPORTABLE’ 2024 INSC685IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 196-197 OF2024IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 12081-12082 OF2023M/s SITARAM ENTERPRISES Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRITHVIRAJ VARDICHAND JAIN Respondent(s) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NOS.198-199...

Dinesh Lal Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1314 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (Crl.) No.10250 OF2014 DINESH LAL ………APPELLANT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ……RESPONDENT JUDGMENT V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted. This criminal appeal...

Narendra Narayan Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 - Sections 3(6), 5, 6 and 7; Consumer Protection Act; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 7B, 7B(1) and 7B(2); Bengal Land-revenue Sales Act, 1868; State Bank of India Act, 1955; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1970

Advocate for Appellant : Ashutosh Kumar and Nachiketa Jha, Advs.Renuka Sharma, Adv. No. 2

Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, J.1. The question which falls for determination in the present case is as to whether telephone dues of the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, can be recovered as a public demand under the provisions...

Shamnad Basheer vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. N. Sai Vinod

$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5590/2015 & CM No.10090/2018 % Date of decision :23. d April, 2018 SHAMNAD BASHEER ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari and Mr. N....