Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr arvind nigam · Page 1 of about 253 results (0.308 seconds)

Dec 06 2010

Mr. Ajay Chaudhary Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-06-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - sections 154,164,173(4),437,438,439,207; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74, 76, 123, 162

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. L.S. Chaudhary; Mr. Mathew D; Mr. Arvind Nigam; Amicus Curiae; Mr. Raghu Tandon, Advs

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YesDIPAK MISRA, CJ1.The fundamental...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2011

C.S. Agarwal and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 406, 120-B; Letter Patent Act - clause 10; Government of India Act - Sections 107, 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 173, 482

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Siddharth Luthra; Mr. Arvind Nigam; Ms. Ramjana Roy Gawai; Mr. P.K. Dubey; Mr. Abhishek Kr. Rai; Mr. Kunal Sood; Mr. Shailesh Suman; Mr. Anurag Yadav; Mr. Arshadeep Singh; Ms. Vasudha Sen; Mr. Madhur Jain; Mr. Sakal Bhushan; Mr. Sum

1. C.S. Agarwal, the appellant in LPA No.819 of 2010, had filed Writ Petition (Crl.) No.57 of 2010 invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1999

Priyanka Bhatia Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)117; 1999CriLJ2188; 1999(50)DRJ112; ILR1999Delhi203

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arvind Nigam and; Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Advs

ORDERA.K. Srivastava, J.1. This criminal writ petition of Habeas Corpus has been filed by one Ms. Priyanka Bhatia for the custody of her two minor daughters, namely, Akansha and Jayanti aged three and a half and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Mar 05 2015

Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-05-2015

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2015