Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr anindya · Page 1 of about 303 results (0.157 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 1999

C.E.S.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karan Cafe and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226;; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(4), 24, 26(6) and 49;; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 44 and 49

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT519(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anindya Mitra, Adv.

By Court1. All these appeals are against the order of a learned Single Judge whereby directions were issued for restoration of electric supply without any conditions as to depositing any sum on account of the demand...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 1999

State of West Bengal Vs. Gobind Nath Dey and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-10-1999

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 39, 162, 226, 300A and 309;; West Bengal Services Rules - Rule 55(4);; L.R. Act

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT495(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anindya Mitra and ;Mr. Jaydeep Kar, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 8.9.94 passed by a learned single Judge of this court passed in C.O. No. 1309/89 whereby and whereunder the writ application filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2000

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Prodyat Kumar Chowdhury and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-02-2000

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 12, 19, 24 and 226;; Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 168(2), 180, 182 and 236;; Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 180 and 236(3);; Calcutta Municipal Assessment Act

Reported in : (2001)1CALLT279(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anindya Kr. Mitra and ;Mr. Das for Adhikari, Advs.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. A suit was filed by the Calcutta Municipal Corporation hitherto before known as 'Corporation of Calcutta' against the Respondent for recovery of consolidated rates and taxes in respect of holding No. 15A. St....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 2017

Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Lmj International Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-22-2017

Subject : Arbitration

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN G.A. 3306 of 2016 E.C. No.487 of 2013 SLEEPWELL INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. Vs. LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD. For the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2009

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Kec International Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-10-2009

Subject : Commercial Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21, 226 and 227

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Kumar Chatterjee, ;Aniruddha Roy and ;Anil Kumar Gupta, Advs.

Surinder Singh Nijjar, C.J.1. This appeal has been filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the BSNL) against the judgment and order dated July 8, 2009 passed by Justice Sanjib Banerjee in W.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2008

West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Mahad ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-01-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : West Bengal Regulation of Recruitment in State Government Establishments and Establishments of Public Undertakings Statutory Bodies, Government Companies and Local Autorities Act, 1999 - Section 3

Reported in : 2008(4)CHN1

Advocate for Appellant : Anindya Mitra, ;Bhaskar Mitra and ;S.S. Koley, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. In this appeal, the basic questions that arise for consideration are:(1) Whether the selection process that has commenced when different circulars and executive instructions held the field should bo completed on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2008

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-18-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2(2), 3, 3A, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5A, 6, 6A, 6(1), 6(2), 6(3), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 11, 11A, 11(1), 11(2), 11(4), 12, 12(2), 16, 17, 17(4), 18, 18(1), 18(31), 23, 23(1), 24, 24A, 26, 28A, 28(1), 31, 31(1), 31(4), 37, 38, 38A, 39, 40, 40(1), 41, 41B, 42, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 45(3) and 52A; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617; ;West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 2(2), 4, 15(2), 17 and 21D; ;Right to Information Act (RTI); ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;KIAD Act - Section 28(1) and 28(2); ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; ;Validation Act; ;Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962; ;Companies Act, 1882; ;Co-operative Societies Act, 1912; ;Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1952; ;Rent Restriction Act; ;Town and Country Planning Act, 1947 - Sect

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

Advocate for Appellant : M.P. Raju, ;Idrish Ali, ;Chandreyi Alam and ;Aparna Samanta, Advs. in W.P. No. 28304 (W) of 2006, ;Siddhartha Sankar Ray, ;Somendra Chandra Bose, ;Sundrananda Paul, ;Tarun Kr. Chatterjee, ;Tapas Kr. B

Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.1. These writ petitions were filed as Public Interest Litigations challenging the acquisition proceedings in respect of about 1000 acres of land within the following mouzas, a) Gopalnagar, b) Singherbheri, c) Beraberi, d)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2005

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Sanjeevani Projects (P) Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-16-2005

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : West Bengal Land Reforms (WBLR) Act, 1955 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2(7), 2(10), 3A, 4, 4(4), 4B, 4C, 4D and 54; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Section and 2(7); ;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4; ;West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 - Sections 4(5) and 23; ;Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) and 3(2); ;Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 - Rule 5(3); ;West Bengal Land Reforms (WBLR) (Amendment) Act, 1974; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 2000; ;West Bengal Inland Fisheries (Amendment) Act, 1993; ;West Bengal Inland Fisheries Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 17A and 17A(1); ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 - Sections 5(1) and 6; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 48A, 51A, 226 and 254(2); ;West Bengal Town and Country (Planning a

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN241

Advocate for Appellant : Anindya Mitra, ;Anshu Nath Banerjee and ;Krishna Nanda Mukherjee, Advs. in APOT No. 250 of 2005, GA No. 1224 of 2005 and WP No. 352 of 2005 and ;Anindya Mitra, ;Anshu Nath Banerjee and ;Krishna Nanda

D.K. Seth, J. Prelude:1. These two appeals involve identical question of law and fact. Therefore both these matters were taken up and heard simultaneously. The appeals arise out of the interim orders granted by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2011

Manabendra Nath Ghosh and Ors Vs. the Hon'Ble High Court At Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-12-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Original SidePresent:The Hon'ble Justice Pranab Kumar ChattopadhyayAndThe Hon'ble Justice Shukla Kabir (Sinha) A.P.O.T. No. 260 of 2011 G. A. No. 1805 of 2011 Manabendra Nath Ghosh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2012

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-22-2012

Subject : Property

Acts : Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 - Sections 8, 9 ; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 23, 3(a), 7, 24, 17, 50(2), 11A; Impugned Act - Sections 5(2), 3, 4(3); Singur Act. - Section 5(2); Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 (BDA Act) - Section 36; Constitution Of India - Article 254, 254(1)

PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, J. :1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and/or order dated 28th September, 2011. The appellants have challenged the Singur Land Rehabilitation & Development Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial