Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr ajay gupta · Page 1 of about 144 results (0.097 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 2014

Civil Writ Petition No. 10066 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. Union Territory, Cha ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-20-2014

Subject : Right to Information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.10066 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.03.2014 Court on its own motion ..Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2011

Baker Oil Tools(India) Pvt.Ltd. and anr. Vs. Baker Hughes Ltd.and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Chetan Sharma; Mr. Siddharth Mittal; Mr. Shashi Mohan, Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes 1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2002

Mehmood Khan Vs. State Through Pp

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-12-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Juvenile Justice Act, 1986; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 2002CriLJ2123; 2002(2)WLC380; 2002(1)WLN707

Advocate for Appellant : Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv.,; Himmat Singh,; Praveen Balwa

Parihar, J.1. The incident is alleged to have taken place on 6.3.2000. It has been alleged that the petitioner along with three other co-accused threw acid on the family members of the complainant resulting in multiple...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 31 2014

Present: Ms.Navdeep Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-31-2014

Subject : Service Tax

CRM-M-27852-2013 1 IN THE PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27852-2013 Date of decision : 31.07.2014 Meenakshi Sharma ..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL Present: Ms.Navdeep, Advocate for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2013

Present:- Mr. H.S. Sawhney Senior Advocate With, Vs. Versus

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-12-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :26. 8.2013 CWP No.15343 of 2009 Date of Decision :12. 9.2013 The Hartan Co-operative Transport Society Ltd......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2001

Subhash Vs. Delhi Pollution Control Committee and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-18-2001

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT650

Advocate for Appellant : Shahid Ali, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to respondent No. 4 to stop the spreading/emitting of pollution and also directing respondents 1 to 3, 5 & 6 to take appropriate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2008

Hardeva Ram and ors. Vs. Jai Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-19-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2008

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The parents, the brothers and the sisters have challenged the award dated 23.10.98 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nim-Ka-Thana, District Sikar (for short 'the Tribunal',), whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2011

M/S. Digicable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Star Den Media Servi ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Feb-02-2011

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : For Petitioner: Mr.Manider Singh Sr.Advocate, Mr. Navin Chawla, Advocate, Mr. Sharath Sampath, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr. Gaurav Juneja, Mr. Praveen Pahuja, Ms. Garima Sharma, Advoc

S.B. SINHA Interpretation of various clauses of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulations, 2004 (The Regulations) as amended from time to time arise for consideration in these petitions. 2. We may, at the outset,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2013

Rakesh Kamboj Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.1124 of 2009 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:22. 08.2013 Rakesh Kamboj …..Appellant versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2013

R.S.a No. 4207 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Krishan Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-02-2013

Subject : Education

R.S.A No.4207 of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH -.- R.S.A No.4207 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:2nd April, 2013. State of Haryana & Ors......Appellants Versus Krishan Kumar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial