Advanced Search Results
Anil Kumar vs Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 103 Zone 9 Delhi
Delhi
Jan-21-2026
Land Acquisition
Ms. Priyanka Rathi, Mr. Ashwini Chandrasekaran
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21st January, 2026 + W.P.(C) 843/2026 & CM APPL. 4124/2026 ANIL KUMAR SON OF SHRI REWAR MAL E-5, BUDH NAGAR, INDERPURI, CENTRAL...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. M/S.Kiran Machines and ors.
Chennai
Mar-11-2011
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) - Section 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120-B r/w.420, 409, 467, 468, 471; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2) r/w.13(1)(d), 7, 10, 11, 13, 15
Mr.N.Chandrasekaran, Adv.
ORDER1. These Criminal Revision Cases have been filed by the State represented by SPE/CBI/EOW,Chennai against the orders of the learned trial Judge, namely the IX Additional Judge, City Civil Court (Special Judge for CBI Cases), Chennai,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Hameed Vs. M. Sultan Abdul Kader
Chennai
Jul-01-1996
Tenancy
(1996)2MLJ579
Mr. K. Chandrasekaran
ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Respondent was served through Court. There is no representation on his behalf. Heard Mr. K. Chandrasekaran, learned Counsel for the petitioner - tenant.2. This revision petition has been filed against the order in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Annamalaiyar Paper Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Deputy Commiss ...
Chennai
Aug-26-2011
Land Acquisition
Mr.A.Chandrasekaran, Adv.
1.This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in S.P.No.31 of 2011 in A.P.No.VAT 62/2011 dated 20.07.2011,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Dhandapani Vs. Hemalatha
Chennai
Jun-06-2012
Criminal
Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 378, 256
Mr.P.Chandrasekaran, Adv.
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section of 378 Cr.P.C., against the order dated 25.08.2006, made in C.C.No.495 of 2003 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate's Court No.VI, Coimbatore.J U D G M E N T1....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.Venkatesh .. Vs. Anna University Rep.by Its Registrar, and anr.
Chennai
Jun-16-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mr.K.Chandrasekaran, Adv.
1. The petitioner has come out with a prayer for a direction to the respondents to re-assess the petitioners answer book in Digital Image Processing having Subject Code EC 1009 of the year 2009-2010 and declare...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSathyamurthy Vs. Sri Vasan Finance Corporation by Its Managing Partner ...
Chennai
Nov-12-1981
Civil
(1982)1MLJ242
Mr. R. Chandrasekaran
ORDERS. Swamikkannu, J.1. This revision petition raises a. very interesting question of law which, of course, arises in turn out of the consideration whether the order of the Court below, which is the subject-matter of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSt. Adaikalamatha Trust Represented by Its Manager and Mother Superior ...
Chennai
Jul-08-1994
Property
(1994)2MLJ608
Mr. K. Chandrasekaran, Mrs. Prabha Sridevan
Somasundaram, J.1. The appellant in Second Appeal No. 26 ofl983isapublictrustanditisplaintiffi No. S. No. 367 of 1980 on the file of the District Munsif, Tiruvarur. The respondents in the second appeal are defendants 1 to 3 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.Santhana Manikandan. Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, and Ors,
Chennai
Aug-05-2010
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226
Mr.K.Chandrasekaran, Adv.
1. The petitioner is a physically challenged person, as he is visually handicapped. He is a Post Graduate in History. He also passed M.Phil.2. The second respondent issued a notification dated 10.11.2008 calling for applications to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Suthendraraja and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others
Chennai
Aug-09-1994
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(1), 39, 39A, 227 and 227(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 303, 304 and 304(2); Tada - Sections 15
1995CriLJ1496
N. Ganpathi for M/s. P.I. Thirumoorthy, ;S. Kumaradevan and ;S. Doraisamy, Advs.
Arunachalam, J.1. An unfortunate episode of non-reconciliation between the defence lawyers engaged as State Brief Counsel and the State, on the quantum of fees payable to those counsel, has led to a grinding belt, of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »