Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: moti lall · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 26 2016

The State of Maharashtra Through The Chief Secretary Government of Mah ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-26-2016

Subject : Education

Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. All the writ petitions are heard by consent as assigned expressly. The issues are common and, therefore, this concluding common decision. Introduction of the controversy 2. The constitutional reservation policy always...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1969

Dalim Kumar SaIn and ors. Vs. Smt. Nandarani Dassi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-20-1969

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 14, Rule 3 - Order 18, Rule 15 - Order 49, Rule 3(4); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 33, 35, 47, 60, 73, 77 and 115; ;Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 34, 36 and 78; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 91 and 120

Reported in : AIR1970Cal292,73CWN877

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Sinha, Adv.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J.1. This is a suit raised on July 3, 1959, by three sons and two daughters of Moti Lall Sain, who died on November 4, 1955, principally for a declaration that a deed of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1969

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Smt. Nandarani Dassi

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-20-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 58; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 16

Reported in : AIR1970Cal200,74CWN43

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Sen and ;H.M. Dhar, Advs.

Bijayesh Mukherji, J. 1. By this suit raised on January 28, 1958, the Life Insurance Corporation of India (shortened into LIC hereafter, as far as possible), prays for a decree under Order 34, Rule 4 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 1954

Shyama Charan Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-12-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 435, 438, 439 and 523; Uttar Pradesh Manual of Government Orders

Reported in : AIR1955All81; 1955CriLJ261

Advocate for Appellant : Moti Lall, Adv.

ORDERRaghubar Dayal, J. A child about 2 1/2 months old was found abandoned in the compound of the seed stores at Basti on the 19-5-1953. Shyama Charan getting information about the presence of the child there...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1961

Krishna Raj Trading Corporation Vs. Ram Saran Dass and Brothers

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-10-1961

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 38 and 47

Reported in : AIR1962All374

Advocate for Appellant : Behari Ji Dass and ;Moti Lall, Advs.

Srivastava, J.1. This is a judgment-debtor's appeal and raises an important question relating to execution of decrees.2. A compromise was arrived at in this case between the parties which provided:'That the plaintiff and the defendants have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2006

Bhuvneshwar Pd. Gupta and ors. Vs. Dharmnath Prasad and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-12-2006

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 - Sections 9, 9(2), 9(3), 9(4) and 10(4)

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Kr. Srivastava and Alok Anand, Advs.

Syed Md. Mahfooz Alam, J.1. This second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant against the judgment and decree dated 10.4.1990 passed by Sri Eric Mechyari, Additional District Judge, Saran, Chapra in Title Appeal No. 4...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1952

Bombay Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-1952

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 17; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : AIR1954Bom145; (1953)55BOMLR861

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Khambatta, Adv.

1. In this summons which is taken out by the defendant it is asked that the leave granted by my brother Tendclkar J. under clause 12 of the Letters Patent should be revoked. 2. The plaintiffs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1971

Moolchand Purushottam Patel Vs. Sales Tax Officer

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-1971

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(28), 2(33), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12A(4), 22, 37, 37(2), 37(4), 46, 46(2), 48 and 63(3); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 42(3)

Reported in : [1977]40STC475(Bom)

Deshpande, J.1. The petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 818 of 1971 carries on business under the name and style of Empico Traders. He has registered himself as a dealer under the Bombay Sales Tax Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1954

Baroda Oil Cakes Traders Vs. Parshottam Narayandas Bagulia and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-1954

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 17 and 20; Indian Contract Act - Sections 4; County Courts Act, 1888 - Sections 7 and 74; Judicature Act, 1873 - Sections 25(6)

Reported in : AIR1954Bom491; (1954)56BOMLR575; ILR1954Bom1137

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Shah, Adv.

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an appeal against the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baroda, directing that the plaint be returned to the plaintiff for presentation to the propert Court. By his plaint the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1963

M. Kuppuswamy Naicker Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, First Circle, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-02-1963

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17, 18, 18(1), 18(2) and 18(3); Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Bihar Sales Tax Act - Sections 5, 6 and 14A

Reported in : [1963]14STC894(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Venkatesh Iyer, Adv.

ORDERHegde, J. 1. There is a common petitioner in these petitions. Identical questions of law arise for decision in all these petitions. The petitioner is a dealer in iron and steel. During the period between 1st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial