Advanced Search Results

Piara Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1985)IILLJ303P& H

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.L. Gupta

D.S. Tewatia, J.1. Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 313 of 1976, 1097 of 1975 and 2375 of 1975 raise common questions of law and, therefore, a common judgment is proposed. Wherever reference to facts is considered necessary...

Khetmal Vs. Chhaganraj and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 4, 28 and 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 34, Rule 1; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 34, 35 and 87; Transfer of Propety Act, 1882 - Sections 58

Reported in : AIR1968Raj123

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Purohit, Adv.

L.N. Chhangani, J. 1. This is a second appeal by the defendant Khetmal against the appellate judgment and decree of the District Judge, Balotra dated 30th April, 1962. confirming the decree of Civil Judge, Balotra dated...

Vikas Vihar Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Budhiraja Elec ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Vikas Vihar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (‘Society’) has filed CS (OS) No. 192 of 2011 under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (‘Act’) praying for a direction to the learned Arbitrator (Respondent No....

Satbir Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Criminal Misc. No.66670 of 2012 in Criminal Misc. not M-7819 of 2012 ..1.IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.66670 of 2012 in Criminal Misc. not M-7819 of 2012 Date of...

Baldev Raj Arora Vs. Mohinder Lal Sahgal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 03, 2014 + RC. Rev. No.251/2013 & C.M. No.10873/2013 BALDEV RAJ ARORA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hirein....

Capital Cinema Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271, 271(1) and 274(2)

Reported in : (1989)80CTR(P& H)131; [1989]179ITR628(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Mahajan and; Suvir Sehal, Advs.

Gokal Chand Mital, J.1. The assessee was finally assessed at Rs. 1,55,492 against the returned income of Rs. 94,846. Since the returned income was less than 80 per cent. of the assessed income, in the penalty...

Ajit Singh Vs. Adarsh Kaur Gill

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family/Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1888; Indian Contract Act; Limitation Act - Schedule: Article 113; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2008(106)DRJ947

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia, Sr. Adv. an; M.L. Bhargava, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. This order will dispose off IA No. 1604/99 moved under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter 'the CPC') through which the Defendants seek an order rejecting...

Chandu Ram and anr. Vs. Kalyan Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 32, Rule 7

Reported in : AIR1961HP38

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Chaudhary, Adv.

C.B. Capoor, J.C.1. This is a defendants second appeal and is directed against a judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Alandi and Chamba districts.2. The appellants Chandu Ram and Nandu Ram had instituted a...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Prem Singh Deviditta Mal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1), 274 and 274(2); ;Taxation Law (Amendment) Act, 1975

Reported in : [1989]177ITR236(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Bhan, Senior Adv. and; Ajay Mittal, Adv.

S.S. Sodhi, J.1. The matter here pertains to the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), after the deletion of Section 274(2) of the Act by...

Niranjan Kaur Vs. New Delhi Hotels Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi332; ILR1987Delhi285

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Vohra,; Arun Mohan,; Anil Mittal,;

Jagdish Chandra, J. (1) This suit of the plaintiff Niranjan Kaur against the defendants is for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 52,000.1-. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff purchased flat No....