Advanced Search Results
Special Dir., Enforcement Directorate Vs. Mohtesham Mohd. Ismail
Karnataka
Apr-10-2001
CivilFERA
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 4, 4(3), 5, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(3), 19, 34, 37, 40, 52(3), 52(4), 54 and 55; Income Tax Act; Land Acquisition Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
2001(76)ECC160; 2001(131)ELT555(Kar)
Ashok Haranahalli, SCGSC
Hari Nath Tilhari, J.1. This miscellaneous first appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 arises from the order dated 8th July, 1994 passed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, New Delhi,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmol Shripal Sheth Vs. M/S. Hari Om Trading Co. and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-03-2012
Land Acquisition
1. All the three applications are filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner from the three proceedings is the same and the same point is involved in the three proceedings and so they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGulmali Amrullah Babul and Others Vs. Shabbir Salebhai Mahimwala and O ...
Mumbai
Oct-29-2015
Arbitration
1. By Arbitration Petition No.410 of 2015 filed under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short âthe Arbitration Actâ?), the petitioners (original respondents) have impugned the order dated 11th October 2014 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vasanthu Sumalatha Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Chief Secre ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-29-2015
Land Acquisition
Common Order: (Ramesh Ranganathan, J.) Personal liberty is of the widest amplitude covering a variety of rights. Its deprivation shall only in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law conformable to the mandate of the Supreme...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe General Manager, UCO Bank and Another Vs. Shri Jitendra Kumar Shri ...
Chhattisgarh
Jan-04-2016
Land Acquisition
CAV Order: 1. Renowned issue that emanates for consideration in this writ petition is whether the employer (petitioners herein) is justified in forfeiting the amount of gratuity payable to the employee (respondent herein) on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Amritlakshmi Machine Works and Another Vs. The Commissioner of Cu ...
Mumbai
Jan-29-2016
Land Acquisition
Mr. Nariman, Mr. Tripathi
M.S. Sanklecha, J. 1. This Full Bench has been constituted on a reference made on 23rd April, 2015 by a Division Bench of this Court in Amritlakshmi Machine Works and Others v/s. The Commissioner of Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Police Uniform Production Centre Vs. the Director General and Ins ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-12-1988
Contract
Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
AIR1990AP9
Ch. Ravindranath, Adv.
ORDERYogeshwar Dayal, C.J. 1.This writ appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge dt. 15-2-1988 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant against an order dt. 22-12-87 passed by the Director General...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuomoto Proceedings in Flesh Trade Vs. State and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Oct-08-2007
Criminal
2008(1)JKJ161
Mr. M.A. Qayoom
Bashir A. Kirmani, J.1. On 02.05.2006, this Court initiated suomoto proceedings in the matter in following terms:1. For a couple of preceding days, painful reports regarding inducement, and blackmail of teen-aged girls to lure and coerce...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKesar Singh Vs. State and ors.
Jammu and Kashmir
Oct-05-2007
Civil
2008(2)JKJ598; (2008) 15 SCC753
Nirmal Singh, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManharibhai Muljibhai Kakadia and anr. Vs. Shaileshbhai Mohanbhai Pate ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-2012
Criminal
Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 203, 202, 401, 397; Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B
R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The sole question for consideration is, whether a suspect is entitled to hearing by the revisional court in a revision preferred by the complainant challenging an order of the Magistrate dismissing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »