Advanced Search Results
Secretary, Department of Canteen Management Vs. Krishna Kumar Saxena
Rajasthan
Oct-12-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance - Sections 18
[2001(91)FLR352]; (2001)ILLJ896Raj; 2001(1)WLC169
Mohd. Rafiq, Adv.
Arun Madan, J.1. This special appeal is directed against the order dated July 28, 2000 passed by the learned single Judge allowing an application filed by Krishna Kumar Saxena (respondent No. 1) under Section 17-B of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoard of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Rajendra
Rajasthan
Feb-19-2001
Service
Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependents of Govt. Servants (Dying While in Service) Rules, 1975; Rajasthan Recruitment of Dependents of the Deceased Government Servants on Compassionate Ground Rules, 1996, Rules 2, 5, 10(3), (6) and 15; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5; Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989 - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 137; Rajasthan General Clauses Act - Sections 6(1); Kosia Area (Restoration of Lands to Raiyats) Act, 1951 - Sections 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
2001(4)WLN401
R.N. Mathur and; Mohd. Rafiq, Addl. Advs. General and; M
ORDERLakshmanan, C.J.1. All the above appeals were filed by the State of Rajasthan against the common judgment dated February 2, 2000 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, partly allowing the writ petitions filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKeshav Dev and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
May-19-2005
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2) and 439; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 53, 304B, 305, 306, 307, 342, 366A, 376, 379, 386, 396, 411, 414, 467 and 498A; ;Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 15B, 36A and 36A(4); Constitution of India - Article 21
2005CriLJ3306; II(2005)DMC398; [2006(2)JCR186]; RLW2005(3)Raj1865; 2005(3)WLC482
M.K. Kaushik, Adv.,; Mohd. Rafiq, Addl. Adv. General,; R
Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. The point involved in the present case is as to whether Clause (i) of proviso (a) to Section 167 or Clause (ii) of proviso (a) to Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. will be applicable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Rajasthan Vs. Shri R.P. Agarwal and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-03-2006
Service
Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16; Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 244 and 244(1); Bombay Civil Service Rules, 1959 - Rule 161 and 161(2); Railway Establishment Code - Rule 1801
RLW2006(2)Raj1654; 2006(3)WLC620
Mohd. Rafiq, A.A.G.
S.N. Jha, C.J.1. The State of Rajasthan has come in appeal against the decision of the learned Single Judge dated 29.5.97 allowing the writ petition of respondent No. 1 R.P. Agrawal with a direction to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOlive E. Malaki Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-06-2005
Constitution
Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institution Act, 1989 - Sections 2, 9, 9(2) and 10; Rajasthan Societies Registration Act; Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959; Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-in-aid and Service Conditions etc.) Rules, 1993 - Rules 23, 23(2), 23(3) and 24
AIR2005Raj296; RLW2005(3)Raj1636; 2005(3)WLC98
Prem Asopa, Sr. Adv. and; Amit Kuri, Adv.,; Mohd. Rafiq
K.S. Rathore, J. 1. Since in all these there writ petitions similar question of law are involved, the same are being decided by this common judgment.2. In all the aforesaid writ petitions the provisions of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMushtaq Ahmed and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-10-2002
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226
98(2002)DLT299
B.B. Gupta,; Kirpal Singh and; Sanjiv K. Choudhary, Adv
S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. Rule. In the present petition, the petitioners have sought a declaration that the properties bearing Nos. 1437 and 1463 are not 'enemy properties' and that the notice dated 19.9.1999, was illegal and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHardeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2008
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 27, 54 and 59; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 148, 149, 302, 307, 326, 336, 427 and 447; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 170, 173, 173(1), 200, 306, 319, 319(1), 319(4) and 482; Constitution of India - Article 136
2009(57)BLJR512
Vibhakar Misra,; Abhisth Kumar,; K.K. Pandey,;
C.K. Thakker, J.1. Leave granted.2. Both the parties in the High Court have filed present appeals against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, dated October 23, 2006 in Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYogesh Saini Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jan-28-2003
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Rajasthan Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 - Sections 14(A); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR2003Raj209; 2003(2)WLC47
N.C. Choudhary and;Amit Choudhary;Rakesh Kumar, Advs.
ORDERK.S. Rathore, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as member of the UIT Alwar on 4-3-2002 by the State of Rajasthan under Sections 9, 12 and 14 (Ka) of the UIT Act, 1959. Earlier the petitioner was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHabu Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Dec-05-1986
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 304, 362 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 39A, 226 and 392; Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 59
AIR1987Raj83; 1987(1)WLN272
Ravi Kasliwal, Adv.; S.C. Agarwal,; H.C. Gupta,;
Dave, J.1. This larger Bench has been constituted by the orders of the Chief Justice, dt. July 3, 1986, to answer a question referred to larger Bench by our brother Hon'ble G. K. Sharma, J. vide...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwar Parashar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-30-2001
Civil
Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 63(4)
AIR2002Raj31; 2002(2)WLC230
Himmat Singh, Adv.
Kokje, J. 1. Heard Mr. Himmat Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mohd. Rafiq, AAG for the State. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter was finally heard. The petitioner is an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »