Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mohd nasir and · Page 1 of about 104 results (0.085 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 2005

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-2005

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1330/2003 and 151/2004 and ;Mohd. Nasir, Adv. in C

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In C.R. No. 1330/2003 question has been referred for consideration of Larger Bench as to applicability of Section 5 of Limitation Act to a revision preferred under Section 19 of M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1992

Krishan Kumar Vs. State (Delhi Administration) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-09-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 397

Reported in : 1993CriLJ19; 1993(1)Crimes185; 1992(24)DRJ595

Advocate for Appellant : Mohd. Nasir and ; Seema Gulati, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The Revisionist, Krishan Kumar, has come up against an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi dated 2nd July, 1992 whereby the Additional Sessions Judge had framed & charge under Section 307-I.P.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1995

Mohd. Nasir and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-14-1995

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1995(3)WLC217; 1995(1)WLN519

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhagwati Prasad

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. These revision petitions have been directed against the order dated 26.6.93 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, (Sessions Judgej Sriganganagar in aforementioned Special Case 'Stale v. Hardayat Singh & Others', whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 1989

Mahavir Prasad and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-14-1989

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Reported in : 1989(2)WLN573

Farooq Hasan, J.1. These five criminal miscellaneous petititions land themselves support to disposal by a common order having been filed by three petitioners, namely Mahavir Prasad, Mohd. Nasir s/o Mohd. Hussain & Mohd. Nasir s/o Haji...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Paltu Ram Sahu and Another Vs. Devi Prasad Thakur and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Mar-13-2015

Subject : Labour and Industrial

1. The appeal is against the award dated 25/09/2014 passed in Case No.28/W.C. Act/2013 Fatal by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Durg. By such award, a compensation of Rs.4,36,800/- was awarded to the claimants. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2016

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Nemmara Branch represented by The ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Anil K. Narendran, J. 1. The appellant is the second opposite party in W.C.C.No.269 of 2006 on the file of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Palakkad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commissioner'), an application filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2016

Sanjeev Vs. Dundappa and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-12-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Harish S. Maigur

(This MFA is filed U/Sec. 30(1) of WC Act 1923, against the Judgment and Award dated 26.11.2011 passed in W C A S R No. 21/2011 on the file of the Labour Officer and Commissioner for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2009

Fazal Haq Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-26-2009

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Phychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 29, 42, 50 and 57; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Bombay Prohibition Act 1949 - Sections 65, 66(1) and 81; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120A

Reported in : 166(2010)DLT57

Advocate for Appellant : Nitya Ramakrishanan,; Yamini Jai Shanker, Advs. in Crl. A. 866 and 867/2008 and ;

Indermeet Kaur, J.1. On 2.6.2007 at about 2.20 PM a secret information was received by Inspector Joginder Singh PW-4 of Police Station Nabi Karim that two Afghan nationals namely Mohd. Nasir and Fazal Haq through another...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2013

Upendra Kumar Kaliya Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-01-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satish Shrivastava, Mr. D.K. Dixit, Mr. Vikas Mishra, Mr. Shailendra Verma, Mr. P.S. Tomar, Mr. Sunil Singh Sengar, Mr. Gajendra Tamsikar, Mr. V.K. Shukla, Mr. Pushpendra Yadav, Mr. Manot Chandurkar, Mr. Jitendra Tiwari, Mr. G.S. Gaharwar

Review Petition No.986/2012 01.03.2013 Mr. Satish Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.B. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondents. Heard on I.A. No.14613/2012, an application for condonation of delay. For the reasons assigned in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2019

Nandu vs.state

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-06-2019

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Badrinath

$~ * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. h September,2019 Judgment pronounced on:6. h November,2019 CRL.A. 379/2019 & Crl.M.(BAIL) 574/2019 AKASH @ BHOLE ..... Appellant Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial