Advanced Search Results
Pusaram and ors. Vs. Manmal and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-28-1951
Property
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 47
AIR1952Raj102
Mohanlal Joshi, Adv.
Bapna, J.1. This is a second appeal by the contesting defendants in a suit for redemption. The respondents Nos. 1 to 5 sued the appellants on the allegations that a certain shop described in the plaint...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrakash Rasiklal Dhariwal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and the ...
Mumbai
Feb-22-2005
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 3, 7 and 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 41, 73, 120, 155, 167, 173(2), 204, 204(1), 384, 387, 439, 466, 467 and 482; MCOC Act, 1999 - Sections 3, 25 and 25A; MOCA Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1893 - Sections 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 64, 65, 73, 160, 161, 164, 167, 173, 173(8), 190, 200, 202, 203, 204 and 319; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 41(1), 41(2), 55(1), 56, 44(1), 44(2), 167, 190 and 204
2005(3)MhLj916
Sarvashri Adhik Shirodkar, Sr. Counsel and ;Rajendra Shirodhkar, Adv.;Sarvashri Raja Thakare, ;Ejaz Khan and ;A.M. Chimalkar, Advs.
R.M.S. Khandeparker, J.1. We have heard at length the learned advocates for the parties. 2. Rule. By consent the rule is made returnable forthwith. 3. The Petitioner challenges the Warrant issued against his father Rasiklal Dhariwal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLife Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Smt. Manjula Mohanlal Joshi
Orissa
Jan-20-1975
InsuranceContract
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 19
AIR1975Ori116
R.C. Patnaik, Adv.
S.K. Ray, J.1. This is an insurer-defendant's appeal from the decree passed in a suit instituted in forma pauperis bythe wife of the assured consequent upon the death of the assured, her husband, on whose life...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Ramjanki Devi, Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-07-1990
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 132(5) and 273A; Constitution of India - Article 226
(1990)88CTR(Raj)207; [1991]188ITR63(Raj)
S.M. Mehta,; R.S. Mehta and; Anil Mehta, Advs.
V.S. Dave, J.1. A common question as to 'whether the petitioners' applications under Section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been wrongly rejected by the Commissioner of Income-tax', is involved in all the above three...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›