Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mohan parasaran · Page 1 of about 265 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 15 2004

Tamil Nadu Kalyana Mandapmam Am Assn. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 17, 65, 65(19), 65(20), 65(22), 65(23), 65(41), 65(48), 66, 66(1), 67, 68, 85(2), 88 and 93; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1) and 6(3); Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 1998; Finance (No.2) Act, 1996 - Sections 85; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 246(3) and 366(29A); Constitution of India (46th Amendment) Act - Article 366(29A); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : AIR2004SC3757; (2004)4CompLJ108(SC); 2004(3)CTC63; (2004)188CTR(SC)297; 2004(93)ECC353; 2004(167)ELT3(SC); [2004]267ITR9(SC); [2004(4)JCR66(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC568; (2004)3MLJ; (2004) 5 SCC 632

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv. and ; Krishnamurthi Swami, Adv

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.04.2001 in Writ Petition No. 1617 of 1998 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the Division Bench of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2007

Commr. of Customs, Bangalore Vs. Acer India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-12-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Computers (Additional Duty) Rules, 2004 - Rule 2; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3, 3(3), 3(4) and 33; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Act - Sections 19

Reported in : 2008BusLR7(SC); 2007(122)ECC412; 2007(148)LC412(SC); JT2007(12)SC287; 2007(12)SCALE581; (2008)1SCC382; 2007AIRSCW6938

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; K. Swamy and; B. Krishna Prasad, A

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Revenue is in appeal before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 13.09.2006 passed by the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zone Bench at Bangalore in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1993

M/S. Ganesh Bhavan and Etc. Etc. Vs. the Health Officer, Corporation o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-10-1993

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : T.N. Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 17 to 26, 108, 112-A and 113(2); Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 11-B; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR1994Mad119

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gandhi, ;Sr. Counsel for N. Kriubanandam and ;Mohan Parasaran

ORDER1. Writ Petition No. 4570 of 1993 is filed by Madras Hotels Associations represented by its Secretary and the prayer in the writ petition is to the following effect :'..... to issue a writ of prohibition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 01 2010

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. R.K. Chopra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-01-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act; Central Civil Services (Revision Pay) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3(2), 3(5), 5, 6, 6(2), 6(3) and 7; Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rules 10(2) and 53(1); Railway Servants (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986 - Rule 6(1); Bombay Civil Service Rules, 1959 - Rule 151(1); Central Civil Services (CC and A) Rules, 1957 - Rule 12(4); Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rule 50; Constitution of India - Articles 148 and 309

Reported in : AIR2010SC649; 2010(2)BomCR244; JT2010(1)SC551; (2010)ILLJ862SC; 2010(2)SCALE74; (2010)2SCC763

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; Rashmi Malhotra and; D.S. Mahra,

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. We are, in this case, concerned with a claim of a Government servant for revision of subsistence allowance based on the pay revision effected by the Central Civil Services (Revision Pay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2007

Commnr. of Income Tax and anr. Vs. Distillers Co. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-05-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Excise (Manufacturing and Bottling of Arrack) Rules, 1987 - Rule 14 and 14(3); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43, 43B and 260A; Karnataka Excise (Manufacturing and Bottling of Arrack) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Constitution of India - Articles 265, 301 and 304

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(SC)177; [2007]290ITR419(SC); JT2007(5)SC261; 2007(5)SCALE416; (2007)5SCC353; 2007(1)LC497(SC); 2007(3)KCCRSN142.

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; Chidananda D.L. and; B.V. Balram Das

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent carries on business of arrack bottling, manufacture of industrial alcohol and their marketing. He obtained a licence from the State of Karnataka for the aforementioned purposes in terms of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi Vs. Oriental Fire and General In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-18-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 11 and 36(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 28 to 43A, 44 and 256; Companies Act, 1956; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; Income Tax Rule, 1961 - Rule 1, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR2007SC2248; 2007(2)BLJR1643; (2007)210CTR(SC)162; [2007]291ITR370(SC); JT2007(8)SC349; 2007(8)SCALE170; (2007)6SCC496

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; Mathai M. Palke Dev, Sr. Adv.,; Chid

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.2. Respondent is a subsidiary to the General Insurance Corporation of India. It is wholly a government owned company engaged in the business of general insurance....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1995

Maxwell Dyes and Chemicals Private Ltd. and Another Vs. Kothari Indust ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-27-1995

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1A) and 173

Reported in : [1996]85CompCas111(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran and ;Satish Parasaran, Advs.

A.R. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The common order, which is appealed against was passed by Government J. in respect of the prayers for interim reliefs. The facts, which are the foundation for filing the present appeals are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2012

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: L. Chandrakumar, M.S. Suresh Kumar, A. Sivaji, S.Kanagarajan, G. Rajagopal, SC. for L.P. Maurya, Advocates. For the Respondent: M. Ravindran, and Mohan Parasaran, Additional Solicitor Generals, assisted by A.S. Vijayaraghavan, SCGSC, a

COMMON ORDER P. JYOTHIMANI,J. The issue involved in all these cases relates to the commissioning of Units 1 and 2 of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (for brevity, "KNPP"). Even though the prayers in these writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 2007

Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board Vs. Satyanarayana Brothers ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-07-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR351(SC); 2007(2)AWC1438(SC); JT2007(3)SC616; 2007(2)SCALE602; (2007)10SCC468

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, A.S.G.,; Senthil Jagadeesan and; Rakesh Sh

AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mohan Parasaran, learned Additional Solicitor General for the appellant and Mr. Dipanker P. Gupta and Mr. T.L.V. Iyer, learned senior counsel for the respondent.2. Aggrieved against the order passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Gas Authority of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Keti Construction (i) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6), 16, 16(5), 34, 34(2) and 37; Arbitration Act, 1940; Constitution of India - Article 16 and 16(3)

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR323(SC); 2007(3)AWC2802(SC); 2007(4)CTC435; JT2007(6)SC581; 2007(4)MhLj441; (2007)5MLJ1251(SC); 2007MPLJ458(SC); 2007(7)SCALE98; (2007)5SCC38; [2007] 6 SCR 439

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; Ghanshyam and; Devendra Singh, Ad

G.P. Mathur, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 7.12.2004 of a Division Bench of Delhi High Court by which the appeal filed by M/s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial