Advanced Search Results

Yeshaswinee Merchant and ors. Vs. Air India Ltd. and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Air Corporations Act, 1953 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2002(1)MhLj701

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and ;Geetanjali Prabhu, Advs. i/b., Sanjay Udeshi and Co., ;Anand Grover and ;F. Moosa, Advs. i/b., Halwasia and Co., ;Harish Jagtiyani, Sr. Adv., ;Mohan Bir Singh and ;V.M. Singh, Advs. i/

A.P. Shah, J.1. Whether the air hostesses working in Air India have a right to perform flying duties after attaining the age of 50 years is the principal question that falls for consideration in these writ...

Brigadiar Harjit Singh Son of Late Shri Inder Singh Vs. Rangmahal thea ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 13A(1) and 13A(2); Evidence Act - Sections 79; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 17(1), 23, 25 and 47; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 38(1) and 41; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR794; 2008(2)BomCR166; 2008(2)MhLj362

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Bir Singh and ;Dinesh P. Shah, Advs.

J.H. Bhatia, J.1. Being aggrieved by dismissal of his application under Section 13A(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 (for brief, 'Bombay Rent Act'), the applicant has preferred the present...

Amit Kumar Vs. Indian Airlines Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 17B and 33(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR592; [2006(109)FLR387]; (2006)IILLJ699Bom; 2006(2)MhLj210

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Bir Singh, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. Singh in support of this Appeal. Mr. Dixit appears for the respondent. 2. This Appeal seeks to challenge the order dated 20th July 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge on...

N.N. Sippy Productions Vs. Air France Maker Chambers Vi Nariman Point, ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mohan Bir Singh, Advocate for the Complainant. Mr. J.M. Baphna, Advocate for the O.P.

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member It is alleged by the complainant that for the shooting at abroad location their unit boarded Opposite Partys flight No.AF-135 which was scheduled to travel from Mumbai to...

Allahabad University and Another Vs. Km. Shruti Chaturvedi and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 42; University Grants Commission Act

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC57

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Padia and ;P.S. Baghel, Advs.

D.P. Mohapatra, C.J.1. Thecontroversy raised in these two cases relates to admission of students in Post Graduate Courses of Allahabad University (the University for short) for the session 1997-98. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6951 of...

Dr. Jagdish Saini Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1998Raj349; 1998(3)WLC740

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Tholia,; Alok Sharma and; Ajay Gupta, Advs.

ORDERGyan Sudha Mishra, J. 1. All the petitioners herein in the petitions referred to hereinabove, are Doctors holding a Bachelor's degree in medicine and Surgery and have put in more than five years of service in...

Foundry Plant and Patterns (P) Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(121)ELT106Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the Order-in-Appeal No. 108/95 dated 10-3-1995 issued on 20-3-1995 whereunder the Collector (Appeals), Pune, confirmed the Order-in-Original No. 124/94 dated 31-3-1994 passed by the Assistant Collector,...

Singapore Airlines Ltd. and anr. Vs. QuentIn Rodrigues

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9

Reported in : [2008(118)FLR760]

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh and ;Mitra Das, Advs., i/b., Vasanti Kunder and ;V.M. Parkar, Advs.

S.R. Sathe, J.1. By consent appeal is heard finally at admission stage.This is a case of Singapore Airline's employee who is at Mumbai for last 20 years but opposing his transfer to Jalandhar, on several grounds.2....

Cedric D'Silva Vs. Union of India (UOi) through the Under Secretary to ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(5), 10, 10(1) and 12(5); Aircraft Act; Aircraft Rules, 1937 - Rule 141 and 141B; FDTL and Roistering Rules, 2003

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR70; (2007)109BOMLR2397; [2008(116)FLR247]; (2008)ILLJ483Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Bir Singh, Adv.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner was working as a Senior Commander with Respondent No. 4. By communication of 18th January, 2006the services of the petitioner came to be terminated. The Petitioner thereafter initiated proceedings in conciliation...

B.J. Shetty and Others Vs. Air India Limited and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 9-A and 33(1); Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 - Sections 4 and 8; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 16, 226 and 311(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR559; 2000(1)BomCR743; 2000(4)MhLj274

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Rana, ;S.C., Anand Grover, ;Ms. Dhabholkar, ;Prakash Mahadik, ;H.V. Mehta, ;R.C. Master and ;Mohan Bir Singh, Advs.

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. Rules issued returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service through their respective Counsel. By consent, rules called out and heard finally.2. These three writ petitions, though marginally variant on facts, arise out of the same...