Advanced Search Results
Doddarajappa Vs. Venkoba Rao
Karnataka
Apr-02-1985
Property
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 226; ;Powers of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16 and 21
AIR1986Kant70; ILR1985KAR2109
M. Ranga Rao and ;Jagadish Mundargi, Advs.
Chandrakantaraj URS, J.1. These appeals are directed against the Judgment and Decree in O. S. No. 94/62 on the file of the then Principal District Judge, Bangalore City. Later the suit was transferred to the file...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasappa Vs. Siddagangamma
Karnataka
Mar-10-1992
Family
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18 and 18(2); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 11
II(1992)DMC167; ILR1992KAR1798; 1992(2)KarLJ357
Mirle L. Krishnamurthy and ;H.S. Rama Rao, Advs.
Vasantha Kumar, J. 1. This Regular First Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 1-3-80 passed by the Court of the Civil Judge, Madhugiri, in R.A.No.183/78 while dismissing the appeal the first appellate Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevikarani Vs. Venkatesha Sastry
Karnataka
Apr-21-1994
PropertyCivil
Transfer of Property Act, 19882 - Sections 48 and 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39 - Rule 2A - Order 41- Rule 27 - Order 43 - Rule 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 35
ILR1994KAR1444; 1994(5)KarLJ99
Mirle L. Krishnamurthy, Adv.
Murgod, J. 1. These Appeals arise out of the judgment and decree passed in Original Suit No. 6604 of 1980 on the file of VIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City. They are clubbed and heard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bangaramma Vs. Nanjamma
Karnataka
Dec-11-1992
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 54; Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holding Act, 1966; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holding (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2(1)
ILR1993KAR230; 1993(1)KarLJ116
Mirle L. Krishnamurthy, Adv.
K.A. Swami, Ag. C.J.1. This Writ Appeal is preferred against the order dated 14.3.1991 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 21709/1990.2. The learned Single Judge has rejected the petition, therefore, the petitioners in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Haleem Vs. Kalique Ahmed (Deceased) by L.Rs
Karnataka
Feb-04-1998
Civil
Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 - Sections 66 - Order 41, Rules 11, 13 and 16
Sri Mirle L. Krishnamurthy, Adv.
1. In the memo it has been stated that the matter has been settled out of Court. Hence, the appeal may be dismissed as settled between the parties. It has further been stated that half of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›