Advanced Search Results

New Revtira Co-op Housing Society Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Off ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 23(1), (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Land Acquisition (Mysore Extension and Amendment) Act, 1960 - Sections 18(3)

Reported in : 2000(3)BomCR691

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo, Adv.

ORDERJ.A. Patil, J.1. The petitioner society has failed this petition under Order 47, Rule 1 of the C.P.C. Code and sought review of the Award dated 23-1-1998 passed by this Court in Land Acquisition Reference No....

Vidya Shivajirao Patil and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Bombay Court-Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 46; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 246

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR615; 1999(3)BomCR787

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo, ;N.V. Bandivadekar and ;M.S. D'Mello Advs. i/b. ;Mrs. Parul P. Kapadia

ORDERH.L. Gokhale, J.1. All these three petitions raise a common question with respect to interpretation of the State Government's Notification dated 1-10-1994. Mr. Milind Vasudeo has appeared in support of Petition No. 280 of 1998. Mr....

Kelkar and Kelkar Vs. Indian Airlines and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Reported in : 2004(1)ALLMR847; 2004(1)ARBLR381(Bom); 2004(2)BomCR57

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo, Adv. i/by and ;Puranik and Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 1st November, 1995 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the Arbitration suit filed by the appellant herein under Section 20 of the Arbitration...

In Re: Siddharth Srivastava

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1908 - Sections 9 and 9(2); Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 36; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(14) and 36 - Order 21, Rule 10 - Order 23, Rule 3; ;Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR115(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo and ;Swapnila D. Rane, Advs. i/b., Ashwin Ankhad, Adv.

ORDERJ.A. Patil, J.1. The petitioning creditor has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 (for short, the Act) for adjudicating the judgment debtor as insolvent on the ground that he...

S.N. Gupta Vs. Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade (Enforcement), ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2002)1BOMLR426; 2002(2)MhLj287

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo, Adv., i/b., V. Deshpande & Co.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. Mr. Milind Vasudeo vehemently submitted that the order which has .been assailed by this Petition, which is at Page No. 18 of the Writ Petition, shows that when the notices were returned with...

Al-qahtani Pipe Coating Terminal Vs. Minerals Sales (P.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 443, 446, 456, 457, 460 and 543; Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 19(3)

Reported in : [2008]34SCL89(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Divan, Adv.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. On 13-6-2008 an order was passed dismissing this Company Application. Here are the reasons for dismissing the same:The Company Application is instituted for the following relief:(a) that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to...

Jai Hind Oil Mills and Co. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11B and 35B

Reported in : 1994LC324(Bombay); 1994(71)ELT902(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Milind G. Vasudeo, Adv., i/b., ;Gagrat & Co.

S.M. Jhunjhunwala, J.1. By this Petition, the Petitioners seek to challenge the orders dated 28th August, 1985 and 30th August, 1985 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise Division IV, Bombay II, the copies whereof...

Saumil Dilip Mehta Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 303 and 303(2); Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 267

Reported in : AIR2002Bom194; 2002(3)ALLMR489; 2002(2)BomCR594; (2002)3BOMLR514; [2003]113CompCas443(Bom); 2002(2)MhLj36; [2004]138STC258(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Vasudeo, Adv., i/b., Gagrat & Co.

1. With consent of the counsel appearing for the litigating parties and as a, very short point arises for adjudication, we are disposing this writ petition at this stage finally. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith with the...

P.J. Balani Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1996(83)ELT275(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Milind Vasudeo, Adv., i/b., ;M/s. Gagrat & Co

Pendse, Acting C.J. Rule, returnable forthwith. Shri Siodia, learned counsel for the respondents waives service. By consent petition called out for hearing. Heard counsel. 1. The petitioner preferred appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control)...

Premier Limited, (Formerly) Premier Automobiles Ltd. a Company Incorpo ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections Sections 2, 13, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 19, 19(1), 49 and 49(5); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 51 and 54; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : 2006(5)BomCR12; [2006]133CompCas687(Bom); [2006]71SCL153(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Vikram Nankani and ;Madhur Baya, Advs. in Writ Petition No. 1567 and ;Milind Vasudeo, Adv., i/b., ;R. Ravindran, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 2780, 2781 and 2782

J.P. Devadhar, J. 1. Common question of law involved in all these writ petitions is, whether, an appeal against the adjudication orders passed by the Assistant Director/Deputy Director of Encroachment under the repealed provisions of Foreign...