Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: milind sathe and · Page 1 of about 61 results (0.059 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 12 1992

In Re: Anthony Fernandes and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-12-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 2 and 390; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(4)

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR580

Advocate for Appellant : Clive D'souza, Adv.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The petitioners are legal heirs of Mr. Custodio Nocholas Fernandes (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased'). The deceased died at Karad on or about 16th December, 1989. Smt. Olive Fernandes, wife of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2009

Vithabai Bama Bhandari Indian Inhabitant Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 10(5), 10(6), 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 20(1) and 20(2); ;Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8(3), 8(4), 9, 10, 10(1), 10(2), 10(3), 11, 14, 20, 23, 33; Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; General Clauses Act - Sections 6; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 252, 252(1), 252(2) and 226

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR663; 2009(111)BomLR2093; 2009(4)MhLj693

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Sathe, Sr. Adv. and ;Chirag Balsara, Adv., i/b. Kanga and Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. The petitioner, in this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is seeking following declaration;That it be declared that all proceedings/notifications and notices issued under Section 9 and 10 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1997

Rialto Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 154, 162(2), 167, 176 and 217

Reported in : 1998(1)BomCR397

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Sathe, Adv. i/by ;Bachubhai Munim and Co.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J 1. Rialto Co-operative Housing Society Limited, the petitioner herein, seeks to impugn the legality and correctness of the order passed by the Asstt. Assessor & Collector, 'D' Ward, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 2003

Shri Ambicapratapsinh Sisodia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and R.S. Pillai ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6(1), 9, 10, 20, 21 and 33

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR18; 2003(4)BomCR696; 2003(2)MhLj806

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Sathe, ;Riyaz Chagla, ;Laxmi Mankar and ;Paul P.P., Advs. i/b., Nanu Hormasjee & Co.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Heard Mr. Milind Sathe, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.S. Apte, learned counsel for the respondents.2. Assailing the order of the Appellate Authority dated 9.08.1991 under Section 33 of the Urban...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. E. R. Squibb and Sons Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-15-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)152CTR(Bom)89

Advocate for Appellant : Milind Sathe and S.A. Diwan, for the Revenue P. I. Kaka, for the Assessee

ORDERSakhare, J. By this reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal, at the instance of the revenue, has referred the following question of law for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2014

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. The Honourable the Chief Justice has constituted this Full Bench in order to resolve a conflict between the conflicting views which have been expressed by two Division Benches of this Court. In...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2015

M/s Sion Panvel Tollways Pvt. Ltd., through its Authorized Signatory, ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-08-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.K. Menon, J. 1. Historically speaking toll roads have been in existence since ancient times, be it across plains or mountain passes, through the middle ages till this age as well. The present petitions arise out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2013

Janhit Manch and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Prin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-13-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. This Petition, purportedly filed for public interest, seeks to question the legality of a 56 storied residential building known as ‘Palais Royale' and a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2003

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Land Development Corpora ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-31-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Private Forests Act, 1975 - Sections 2 and 6; Bombay Salsette Estate Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR24

Advocate for Appellant : C.J. Sawant, Spl. C. and ;R.M. Sawant, G.P. and ;K.R. Belosey, A.G.P., ;Pradeep Sancheti, Adv., i/b., Meena A. Fulbandhe, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 1052/1998 and 1383/2002

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Writ Petition No. 1052 of 1998 is filed by the State of Maharashtra against respondent No. 1 for an appropriate writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2012

Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-01-2012

Subject : Service Tax

The above Petition is filed by the Petitioner - Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (“DCHL”) under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) seeking to restrain the Respondent - Board for Control for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial