Advanced Search Results

Sk. Nafel Ali Vs. Sm. Nihar Bala Das

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 - Section 7; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151

Reported in : AIR1981Cal273

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Ray, Adv.

Sudhindra Mohan Guha, J. 1. This second appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the decision of the Subordinate Judge, 4th Court, Alipore affirming the judgment and decree of dismissal passed by Sri A. N. Saha,...

Nagarmal Mahavir Prosad and anr. Vs. the Manager, United Bank of India ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Banking

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 115

Reported in : AIR1987Cal88,[1989]66CompCas292(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Ray, Adv.

Nirendra Krishna Mitra, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the writ petitioner against the rejection of the writ application moved against the act of the respondent No. 1 in not selling the demand drafts...

HasimuddIn Mandal Vs. Golam Mahebub and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988CriLJ1900

ORDERGobinda Chandra Chatterjee, J.1. This revisional application is directed against the Judgment and order dated the 11th May 1981 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, First Court, Murshidabad, while exercising his power of revision in connection...

Anil Kumar Shaw and ors. Vs. Municipal Commissioner, Calcutta Municipa ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Section 10

Reported in : (1990)1CALLT46(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rupendra Nath Mitra, ;Majibar Rahman and ;Debatosh Khan, Advs.

Paritosh Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. For enforcement of the terms of agreement dated June 7, 1982, and July 1, 1982, entered into by the Corporation of Calcutta and their workmen represented by Falta Water Works and Employees...

Probhat Kumar Mitra Vs. Sukriti Mitra

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 14 and 19(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114

Reported in : AIR1971Cal1,75CWN168

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Roy, Adv.

Chittatosh Mookerjee, J. 1. The learned District Judge, 24 Parganas has made this reference for confirmation of a decree nisi passed by him declaring the marriage between the aforesaid parties as null and void on the...

Paltu Dutta Vs. S.M. Nibedita Roy

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 Sections 24, 47, 115A, 115-A(3) and (4), 397, 397(2), 437, 438 and 482 - Order 1, Rule 10;; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 228;; West Bengal (Amendment) Act, 1988;; Bombay Taluqdari Tenure Abolition Act, 1949 - Section 12;

Reported in : AIR1990Cal262,94CWN1

Advocate for Appellant : Abhijit Banerjee as amicus curiae, ;Mihir Kumar Roy, ;Asoke Kumar Mukherjee, ;Miss. Rita Dutta, ;Gopal Mukherjee, ;Asoke Banerjee and ;Bijit Mitra, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dt. 26-7-89 passed by Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Alipore and order Nos.81 and 82 dated 23-6-89 passed in Title Execution Case No. 11 of...

Sushil Kar and ors. Vs. Syed Mehdi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200, 401 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 76, 79, 324, 379 and 440; ;Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 - Sections 371, 372 and 383

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT331(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Roy and ;Sudhendu Kumar Roy, Advs.

Arun Kumar Dutta, J.1. By the instant revisional application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Code); the petitioners-accused have prayed the Court for quashing the relevant proceedings, being Case...

Sm. Sulekha Bairagi Vs. Prof. Kamala Kanta Bairagi and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10(1) and 13(1); ;Marriage Laws Amendment Act, 1976 - Section 39 and 39(1)

Reported in : AIR1980Cal370,(1980)2CompLJ82(Cal),84CWN716

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Kumar Roy and ;Probir Kumar Samanta, Advs.

B.N. Maitra, J.1. Petitioner has asked for divorce on the ground of his wife's adultery and alternatively for judicial separation on account of her cruelty. His allegation is that in the middle of May, 1959, he...