Advanced Search Results

Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 29, 29(4), 29(6), 29(7) and 29(8); Copyright Act; Trade Marks Act, 1994 - Sections 10(6) and 11(2); Consumer Credit Act, 1974; Consumer Credit Regulation, 1974; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 43, Rule 1; Ahmedabad City Civil Court Rules, 1961

Reported in : AIR2008Guj94; (2008)3GLR1963; LC2008(2)395; 2008(38)PTC658(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv. and; Y.J. Trivedi, Adv.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The appellant-Original Plaintiff has filed this Appeal From Order under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Civil Procedure Code challenging the order dated 25th October, 2007 passed in the application Exh. 6/7 filed...

Garden Finance Ltd. Vs. Addl. Cit

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]257ITR481(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Shah, for the Assessee Mihir Joshi with Manish R. Bhatt, for the Revenue

M.S. Shah, J.In this petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner-company, which is engaged in the business of financing and trading in shares, has challenged the notice dated 28-5-2001 (Annexure A), issued by the...

Shankerlal Nebhumal Uttamchandani Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 87 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income-tax Act - Sections 143(3)

Reported in : [2001]251ITR876(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Shah, Adv.

M.S. Shah, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by an individual who was a partner in the firm called City Construction ('the firm'), for refund of income-tax paid by the petitioner...

Vodafone Infrastructure Ltd. and ors. Vs. ---

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Ms. Niti Dixit, Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Ms. Raunaq B. Mathur, Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Kunal Kaul, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Mr. Sarojanand Jha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. PET. No. 14 of 2012 Reserved on: April 1, 2013 Decision on: April 18, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF: VODAFONE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners...

Sameer Engineering Works Vs. District Collector

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code - Sections 152, 172, 178, 179, 181 and 200; Punjab Land Revenue Act - Sections 85, 86 and 88; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , - Order 21, Rules 72, 84, 85 and 90; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2003)3GLR2638

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi and; Amrita M. Thakore, Advs. for Petitioner No. 1, Special Civil Application No. 1448 of

K.A. Puj, J. 1 1. Special Civil Application No. 1448 of 2003 was filed by one M/s. Sameer Engineering Works, a Partnership Firm engaged in the activity of manufacturing machines like power looms and spare parts...

Ramgopal Polytex Ltd. Vs. Stone on Net India Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 3

Reported in : (2009)2GLR1477

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi and; Tanvish Bhatt, Advs. for; Wadia Ghandy

M.R. Shah, J.1. Rule. Shri C.H. Vora, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No. 1-original plaintiff.2. Shri Mihir Joshi, learned Senior Advocate seeks permission to delete respondent No. 2 so far as...

Krishnamurarilal G. Agrawal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 16, 17, 17A, 41, 42, 48, 48(1), 50 and 50(1); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 63; Gujarat (Amendment) Act - Sections 17A; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 7; Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 - Sections 22(4); Railway Rules - Rule 17; Railway Regulations; Indian Railway Engineering Code; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 254, 256, 257(1), 258, 258(1) and 258(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR959

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi and; Amrita M. Thakore, Advs.

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondent No.2 to release from acquisition and restore possession of the lands belonging to the...

Aman Bhatia Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mihir Joshi

SURESH KAIT, J. 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner has sought to set aside/ quash the FIR No.62/2003 registered with police station Anti-Corruption Branch under Section 7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter...

Tamilnadu Newspring and Papers Ltd. Vs. Adani Exports Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : ContractCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 42, Rule 2

Reported in : AIR2004Guj259; I(2005)BC540; (2004)2GLR1674

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi and; Mayank Buch, Advs. for Singhi & Co for Petitioner No. 1

K.A. Puj, J. 1. This Appeal From Order is filed against an order of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, passed by the learned City Civil Judge, Ahmedabad below an application Exh.5 in Civil Suit No. 1076 of...

Babul Products Private Ltd. Vs. Zen Products

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Sales Tax Act; Central Excise Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 (47), 47, 43 and 53; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 2(1), 6(1), 12, 20, 21, 24, 24(1), 24(2), 28(2), 29, 35, 48(2), 49, 49(1), 49(2), 52, 53, 59(2) and 73; Trade Marks Rules, 2002 - Rules 82 to 83, 84; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12(3), 23, 27, 29 and 131; Delhi Rent Control Act; Income Tax Act; Partnership Act, 1890 - Sections 23, 38, 43 and 53; Copyright Act - Sections 19(2), 30, 30A and 54; Contract Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 15, 25, 33, 37 and 41 - Order 2

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2309; 2005(31)PTC135(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : Mihir Joshi, Sr. Adv.,; R.R. Shah and; Harshil R. Shah

ORDERAt this stage Mr. Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate for the appellant requested that the interim relief may be extended for a period of four weeks. Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior Advocate for the respondent has objected to...