Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mehta · Page 1 of about 28,285 results (0.936 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 23 1982

Navuba Gokaiji Chavda and ors. Vs. Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-23-1982

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1962 - Sections 24; Gujarat District Panchayats and Election Rules, 1962 - Rules 8, 10 and 14(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1982Guj281; (1982)2GLR397

Advocate for Appellant : N.J. Mehta, Adv.

ORDER1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are the voters residing within the local limits of Khanusa Gram Panchayat in Vijapur taluka of Mehsana district, have challenged the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2004

PWD Employees' Union Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 137, 145 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Interest Act, 1839; Administrative Law

Reported in : (2005)1GLR262

Advocate for Appellant : Shalin N. Mehta, Adv.

H.K. Rathod, J.1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta for the appellant. Learned Advocate General Mr. S.N. Shelat is appearing for the Respondents State of Gujarat. In this appeal, order made by the learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2008

Amardeep Association Navsari Vs. Deputy Collector and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-25-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Stamp (Determination of Market Value of Property) Rules, 1984 - Rules 4 and 8; Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 32A, 39(1)(B), 44, 44(2), 53, 53A, 53(1), 53(1A), 53(2), 54, 54(1), 54(2), 55 and 56; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)1GLR112

Advocate for Appellant : Ketty A. Mehta, Adv.

M.D. Shah, J.1. Since common questions arise for consideration in all these petitions instituted under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the parties to these petitions are also common, by consent of the learned Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 1999

Dr. Bhim Singh Dahiya Vs. Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-20-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1999)122PLR279

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gurnjan Mehta, Adv.

V.K. Bali, J. 1. This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 10269 and 10280 of 1998 as common questions of law and fact are involved therein. The facts have, however. been extracted from Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2001

Mehta Rameshchandra Manilal Vs. Spl Land Acquisition Officer

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-27-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 23

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3672

Advocate for Appellant : A.J. Patel, Adv. for Appellant in F.A. Nos. 2129 to 2134, 2136 and 2142 of 1995,; K.T. Mehta, Adv. f

M.R. Calla, J.1. We have before us two sets of First Appeals. The first set of First Appeals is a group of 13 First Appeals i.e. First Appeals No. 2129 to 2134 of 1995 (6) and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2006

Sudhari @ Shivadhari Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Jul-31-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 450 and 376

Reported in : 2006(4)MPHT49(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Neeraj Mehta, Adv.

D.R. Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23-8-2001 delivered in Sessions Case No. 212/2001 by Shri T.P. Sharma, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Koriya (Baikunthpur), whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 450...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1976

Dr. D.C. JaIn Vs. the University of Jodhpur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-26-1976

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Jodhpur University Act, 1962 - Sections 16 and 16(2); Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 245; Jodhpur University (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; Jodhpur University (Amendment) Act, 1975

Reported in : AIR1977Raj89; 1976(9)WLN820

Advocate for Appellant : L.R. Mehta, Adv.

ORDERM.L. Joshi, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner challenges the validity of the appointment of non-petitioner No. 3 Dr. S. Divakaran as Professor Structural Engineering, Dean Faculty of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 1978

Rajputana Mining Agencies and Ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'A' Ward

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-22-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(2), 18(5) and 35(9); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 154, 154(1A) and 297(2)

Reported in : (1979)10CTR(Raj)127; [1979]118ITR585(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : Sagar Mal Mehta, Adv.

Dwarka Prasad, J.1. These 15 writ petitions raise common questions of fact and law and as such it would be convenient to dispose of them by a common order.2. The petitioners are the shareholders of M/s....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2011

Progetto Grano S.P.A. Vs. Shri Lal Mahal Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-07-2011

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 49, 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rule 4

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant K. Mehta; Ms. Tanya Khare; Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs.

1. By this order I shall dispose of the objections raised by the defendant vide the affidavit dated 10.08.2011 to Mr. Jayant K.Mehta, Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. The affidavit has been filed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2005

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Uppal Engineering (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-2005

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2006P& H71; (2005)141PLR806

Advocate for Appellant : I.K. Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; Ranjit Mehta, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The defendant-Indian Oil Corporation Limited is the petitioner before this Court.2. The plaintiff-Uppal Engineering Company (P) Limited filed a suit for declaration with some consequential reliefs against defendant No. 1, Syndicate Bank and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial