Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Narang Dairy Products

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 185, 256 and 256(1); ;Partnership Act

Reported in : (1985)49CTR(All)311; [1986]159ITR243(All); [1985]22TAXMAN286(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharatji Agarwal, Adv.

N.D. Ojha, J. 1. The following question has been referred to us by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for our opinion :' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was entitled...

Mahesh Prasad Kedar Nath Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184 and 185(1)

Reported in : [1991]188ITR239(All); [1991]55TAXMAN171(All)

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J. 1. The petitioner is a partnership firm. It applied for and obtained registration under Section 184 of the Income-tax Act for the year 1970-71. This registration was continued year after year till...

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Solar Chemicals (P.) Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 148 and 271(1)

Reported in : (1985)44CTR(All)300; [1984]150ITR410(All)

Advocate for Appellant : M. Katju, Adv.

Ojha, J. 1. The assessee-respondent, M/s. Solar Chemicals Private Ltd., Kanpur, is a private limited company. It was incorporated on August 30, 1960, and carries on business of manufacture of sodium sulphate. Earlier, this business was...

Ram Prasad Pandey Vs. Jagmohan Lal Shukla

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116

Reported in : AIR1977All458

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

M.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit for possession which was filed by the plaintiff-respondent On the allegation that the defendant-appellant had been induct-ed as a licencee by the former and the licence...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. U.P. Hotel and Restaurants Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 34(3)

Reported in : (1983)34CTR(All)62; [1984]145ITR598(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

N.N. Sharma, J. 1. This reference under Section 256, Sub-clause (1), of the I.T. Act, is being disposed of by this order. It was initiated by the Commissioner of income-tax and arose out of the Tribunal's...

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Harish Chandra Agarwal,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 2

Reported in : [1991]189ITR604(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J. 1. A common question is referred in all these three cases. Though the assessees are different, the relevant facts are identical. All the three assessees happened to be partners in a partnership...

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Smt. Pushpawati Devi Singhania

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 24 and 24(6); Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 1D

Reported in : (1991)93CTR(All)233; [1991]188ITR364(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. Under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Tribunal referred the following four questions :1. 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax...

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Maharaja Vibhuti NaraIn Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17(1) and 27(3)

Reported in : (1986)56CTR(All)52; [1987]163ITR554(All); [1986]29TAXMAN146(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

N.D. Ojha, J.1. Proceedings for assessment under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in regard to the assessment years 1967-68, 1968-69 and 1969-70 were initiated against the opposite party and were finalised....

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Umrao Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18(1)

Reported in : [1989]180ITR403(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Markandey Katju, Adv.

K.C. Agrawal, Actg. C.J.1. This reference application has been filed by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax against the judgment of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal deciding the reference against the Department and in favour of the assessee. The...

Surjit Singh Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Bhoodan Act; Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 - Rules 2 and 443

Reported in : 149(2008)DLT515(SC); JT2008(5)SC325; 2008(2)KLT473(SC); (2008)5MLJ106(SC); 2008(6)SCALE207; 2008AIRSCW3231:AIR2008SC2226:2008(4)CivilL2008(3)Supreme170; JT2008(5)SC325; 2008(4)LH(SC)2448; 2008(3)KCCRSN186

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Kapoor,; Mukesh Kumar Verma,; Shweta Kapoor,;

Markandey Katju, J.1. This appeal by special leave has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 10.1.2002 in LPA No. 665 of 2001.2. Heard Shri R.L. Kapoor,...