Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mari gowda · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.028 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 09 1970

D. Rudriah and anr. Vs. the Chancellor, University of Agricultural Sci ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-09-1970

Subject : Constitution

Acts : (Mysore) University of Agricultural Sciences Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2), 24, 25, 39, 40, 40(1), 44 and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 245 and 226

Reported in : AIR1971Kant84; AIR1971Mys84; (1971)1MysLJ328

Advocate for Appellant : M.K. Nambiar and ;B.S. Patil, Advs.

Chandrashekhar, J.1. In these two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the validity of the appointment of respondent 5 (in both these petitions) as the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Agricultural Sciences in Mysore (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2002

Chandramma Vs. Ramachandra and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168

Reported in : ILR2002KAR4612; 2002(6)KarLJ212

Advocate for Appellant : Mari Gowda, Adv.

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. In this revision petition the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, rejecting the application of the petitioner to release the amount in deposit is questioned.2. The amount in deposit is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2008

The Divl. Controller Chief Custodian of Internal Insurance Fund, Insur ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-17-2008

Subject : Insurance

Reported in : 2010ACJ438:AIR2009NOC611(D.B):2009(1)KCCR182:2009(1)AIRKarR137

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Dabali, Adv. in M.F.A. No. 3286/2003 and ;Mari Gowda, Adv. in M.F.A. No. 4386/2003

1. Sri F.S. Dabali, learned Counsel appeared for the claimants and Sri S. Srishaila, learned Counsel appeared for respondent No. 5, Sri Marigowda, learned Counsel appeared for respondent No. 3, Insurance Company. None appeared for respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 19 1993

State Vs. N. Somasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-19-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 154

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT(Cri)214; ILR1993KAR1527; 1992(2)KarLJ227

Advocate for Appellant : Mari Gowda, HCGP

ORDERJagannatha Hegde, J.1. This is an application filed by the State under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an order dated 11.1.1993 passed by the learned II Addl. Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Sessions Case No. 101/91 rejecting the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2008

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bda and the Commissioner, Bda Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-24-2008

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18, 23, 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2), 27, 28, 31 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 1, 1(2) and 2 - Order 24, Rules 1 to 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 142

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR694:2009(1)AIRKarR535:AIR2009NOC1000.

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Hegde, Adv. in CRP No. 831/2005, ;R. Vijayakumar, Adv. in CRP No. 1059/2005 and ;Mari Gowda, Adv. in CRP Nos. 58, 538 and 809/2005

ORDERArali Nagaraj, J.1. C.R.P. Nos. 831, 809, 58, 538 of 2005 arc filed by the same petitioners namely the Bangalore Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'BDA' for short) challenging the correctness of the respective orders...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2011

H V Subramanyaraj Urs S/O Late H L Vodappa Raj Urs. Vs. Smt. D R Lalit ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-03-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26 Rule 9 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Sri: MARI GOWDA. Adv.

1. The rejection of the plaintiffs I.A.No. 10 under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC, to examine the witness through Court Commissioner, in O.S.No.4510/2005. by order dated 20.11.2010 of the V Addl. City Civii Judge, Bangalore City,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1958

R. Chinnappa Vs. R. Arokiaswamy

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-19-1958

Subject : Civil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 10 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR1959Kant21; AIR1959Mys21; (1958)36MysLJ651

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Farukhi, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner was the defendant in Original Suit No. 132/55 on the file of the Munsiff, Civil Station, Bangalore, the Respondent was the plaintiff in that suit. The suit was for the recovery of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1950

Channabasavegowda and ors. Vs. Rangegowda and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-30-1950

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 1, Rule 10; Hindu Law; Mysore Land Revenue Code - Sections 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103

Reported in : AIR1951Kant38; AIR1951Mys38

Advocate for Appellant : V. Krishnamurthy, Adv.

Yenkataramaiya, J.1. This appeal has been referred to the Full Bench for disposal as the Division Bench by which it was heard was of divided opinion as regards the decision in the ease. The suit from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1976

Parasuraman and ors. Vs. Purushothaman and Co. and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-06-1976

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18 and 19 - Schedule - Article 1; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1977Ker132

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Poti,; C.M. Devan and; P.E. Narayana Swamy, Adv

Chandrasekhara Menon, J.1. The scope and ambit of a co-heir's authority to enlarge the period of limitation as against the other co-heirs or co-owners by an acknowledgment of liability or payment of interest or principal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1949

M.S. Ramayya Vs. the District Board

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-21-1949

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1949)1MLJ422

Satyanarayana, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. He was the Headmaster of the Board Higher Elementary School, Kamakarai, run and managed by the respondent, the District Board of Coimbatore. On certain charges framed against him and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial