Advanced Search Results
D. Rudriah and anr. Vs. the Chancellor, University of Agricultural Sci ...
Karnataka
Sep-09-1970
Constitution
(Mysore) University of Agricultural Sciences Act, 1963 - Sections 12(2), 24, 25, 39, 40, 40(1), 44 and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 245 and 226
AIR1971Kant84; AIR1971Mys84; (1971)1MysLJ328
M.K. Nambiar and ;B.S. Patil, Advs.
Chandrashekhar, J.1. In these two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, the validity of the appointment of respondent 5 (in both these petitions) as the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Agricultural Sciences in Mysore (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandramma Vs. Ramachandra and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-14-2002
Civil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 168
ILR2002KAR4612; 2002(6)KarLJ212
Mari Gowda, Adv.
ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. In this revision petition the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, rejecting the application of the petitioner to release the amount in deposit is questioned.2. The amount in deposit is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Divl. Controller Chief Custodian of Internal Insurance Fund, Insur ...
Karnataka
Sep-17-2008
Insurance
2010ACJ438:AIR2009NOC611(D.B):2009(1)KCCR182:2009(1)AIRKarR137
F.S. Dabali, Adv. in M.F.A. No. 3286/2003 and ;Mari Gowda, Adv. in M.F.A. No. 4386/2003
1. Sri F.S. Dabali, learned Counsel appeared for the claimants and Sri S. Srishaila, learned Counsel appeared for respondent No. 5, Sri Marigowda, learned Counsel appeared for respondent No. 3, Insurance Company. None appeared for respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. N. Somasekhar
Karnataka
Apr-19-1993
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 154
1993(2)ALT(Cri)214; ILR1993KAR1527; 1992(2)KarLJ227
Mari Gowda, HCGP
ORDERJagannatha Hegde, J.1. This is an application filed by the State under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an order dated 11.1.1993 passed by the learned II Addl. Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Sessions Case No. 101/91 rejecting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bda and the Commissioner, Bda Vs ...
Karnataka
Oct-24-2008
PropertyCivil
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 18, 23, 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2), 27, 28, 31 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 1, 1(2) and 2 - Order 24, Rules 1 to 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 142
2009(1)KCCR694:2009(1)AIRKarR535:AIR2009NOC1000.
S.G. Hegde, Adv. in CRP No. 831/2005, ;R. Vijayakumar, Adv. in CRP No. 1059/2005 and ;Mari Gowda, Adv. in CRP Nos. 58, 538 and 809/2005
ORDERArali Nagaraj, J.1. C.R.P. Nos. 831, 809, 58, 538 of 2005 arc filed by the same petitioners namely the Bangalore Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'BDA' for short) challenging the correctness of the respective orders...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH V Subramanyaraj Urs S/O Late H L Vodappa Raj Urs. Vs. Smt. D R Lalit ...
Karnataka
Feb-03-2011
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 26 Rule 9 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 ;
Sri: MARI GOWDA. Adv.
1. The rejection of the plaintiffs I.A.No. 10 under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC, to examine the witness through Court Commissioner, in O.S.No.4510/2005. by order dated 20.11.2010 of the V Addl. City Civii Judge, Bangalore City,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Chinnappa Vs. R. Arokiaswamy
Karnataka
Aug-19-1958
Civil
Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 10 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151
AIR1959Kant21; AIR1959Mys21; (1958)36MysLJ651
M.N. Farukhi, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner was the defendant in Original Suit No. 132/55 on the file of the Munsiff, Civil Station, Bangalore, the Respondent was the plaintiff in that suit. The suit was for the recovery of a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChannabasavegowda and ors. Vs. Rangegowda and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-30-1950
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 1, Rule 10; Hindu Law; Mysore Land Revenue Code - Sections 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103
AIR1951Kant38; AIR1951Mys38
V. Krishnamurthy, Adv.
Yenkataramaiya, J.1. This appeal has been referred to the Full Bench for disposal as the Division Bench by which it was heard was of divided opinion as regards the decision in the ease. The suit from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParasuraman and ors. Vs. Purushothaman and Co. and ors.
Kerala
Oct-06-1976
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18 and 19 - Schedule - Article 1; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 19
AIR1977Ker132
S.N. Poti,; C.M. Devan and; P.E. Narayana Swamy, Adv
Chandrasekhara Menon, J.1. The scope and ambit of a co-heir's authority to enlarge the period of limitation as against the other co-heirs or co-owners by an acknowledgment of liability or payment of interest or principal is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.S. Ramayya Vs. the District Board
Chennai
Jan-21-1949
Civil
(1949)1MLJ422
Satyanarayana, J.1. The plaintiff is the appellant. He was the Headmaster of the Board Higher Elementary School, Kamakarai, run and managed by the respondent, the District Board of Coimbatore. On certain charges framed against him and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »