Advanced Search Results
Badshah Vs. State
Delhi
Jan-18-2000
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 50
2000IIIAD(Delhi)668; 2000CriLJ2119; 84(2000)DLT652; 2000(53)DRJ487; 2000(69)ECC615
Mr. Manoj D. Taneja, amices Curia
ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J. 1. This appeal has been on board for a long time. No one is appearing for the appellant. thereforee, in the interest of justice, Mr. Manoj D. Taneja, Advocate, is appointed amices Curiae...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Bhardwaj Vs. Uoi and Others
Delhi
Nov-05-1992
Criminal
1993CriLJ2624
Mr. Tirlok Kumar and; Mr. Manoj D. Taneja, Advs
ORDER1. The detention order was passed against the petitioner, Dinesh Bhardwaj dated 19th February, 1992 under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter called as the 'COFEPOSA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Alias Bharat Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
Sep-25-1992
Criminal
1993CriLJ1156; 1992(3)Crimes687; 49(1993)DLT521; 1992(24)DRJ277
Mr. Trilok Kumar and; Mr. Manoj D. Taneja, Advs
Mohd. Shamim, J.1. The petitioner through the present petition wants to challenge an order of detention made against him by the Union of India vide Notification No. 673/394/91-Cus. VIII dated September 25, 1991 passed by Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Aruna V. Kumar and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Delhi
Apr-30-2007
Criminal
Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 29 and 29(2)
2007(96)DRJ332
Manoj D. Taneja, Adv
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.COM. CASE. 263/2003Under Section 29(2) DDA ACT1. The petitioner claims a quashing order in respect of a complaint filed by the Delhi Development Authority alleging commission of offence under Section 29 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›