Advanced Search Results
Malkiat Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-03-1968
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 5
AIR1969P& H250
Manmohan Singh, Adv.
Sandhawalia, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was admitted to hearing by a Division Bench as on the averments made therein important issues pertaining to the nationality and the domicile of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLachhman Dass Deceased and ors. Vs. Veer Finance Company and ors.
Delhi
Nov-26-1982
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(l) and 30; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 119
AIR1983Delhi397; 23(1983)DLT231; 1983RLR109
M.S. Sahni and; S.P. Gupta, Advs
Leila Seth, J.(1) This first appeal is directed against the judgment and order of Mr. S.C. Ahuja, Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Delhi dated 17th November, 1970. It raises an interesting point pertaining to the question of limitation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManmohan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-27-1994
Criminal
Arms Act - Sections 25; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 380, 411 and 454; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161
1994CriLJ3695
R.S. Cheema, Sr. Adv. and; M.L.S. Waraich, Adv.
S.S. Grewal, J.1. Vide order of Sessions Judge, Amritsar, dated 15-6-1993, Manmohan Singh appellant was convicted Under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gold Star Co. Ltd. Vs. Gold Star Industries Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Dec-01-1994
Intellectual Property Rights
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
1995IAD(Delhi)369; 57(1995)DLT658; 1995(33)DRJ188
Manmohan Singh and; M.L. Mangala, Advs
Usha Mehra, J. (1) By this application M/s Gold Star Co. Ltd., plaintiff had sought an ex parte interlocutory order, inter alia, on the grounds that the plaintiff is a registered proprietor of the trade mark...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFedders Lloyd Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Fedders Corporation a ...
Delhi
Sep-19-1997
Intellectual Property RightsLimitation
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 46(l)(6) and 46(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137
1997VIAD(Delhi)53; 1997(2)ARBLR84(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT474; 1997(43)DRJ410
Parveen Anand,; Binni Kalra,; Manmohan Singh,;
K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The two petitioners had filed a petition against Fedders Corporation (the first respondent) for removal of the Trade Mark No. 175253 and in the alternative for rectification. The second respondent is the Registrar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakuntala Monga and ors. Vs. N.M.W. Products and ors.
Delhi
Sep-11-2003
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 12, 28 and 29
2004IAD(Delhi)138; 107(2003)DLT671; 2003(70)DRJ754; 2003(27)PTC278(Del)
Manmohan Singh, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Petitioners Smt. Shakuntala Monga and others have filed the present petition challenging the order dated 27th September, 1993 passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks rejecting their opposition to the registration of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaidev Singh Vs. Sujan Singh and anr.
Delhi
May-06-1993
Property
Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1)
50(1993)DLT663; 1993RLR462
J.D. Jain and; Manmohan Singh, Advs
D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) This is plaintill's appeal. His suit for declaration and injunction against his two brothers and mother was dismissed by judgment dated 12/11/1969 by the Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi,Plaintiff sought a decree that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGoel Pocket Books Vs. Raja Pocket Books
Delhi
Jul-29-1997
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1
1997IVAD(Delhi)720; 1997(2)ARBLR307(Delhi); 68(1997)DLT128
A.N. Kapoor,; Manmohan Singh,; Sadhana Sharma and;
Mohd. Shamim, J. (1) The appellant through the present appeal have taken exception to the judgment and order dated July 4, 1992 passed by an Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby he allowed an application moved by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSant Ram and Co. Vs. Satnam Overseas and anr.
Delhi
Sep-11-2003
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12(1), 12(3), 18(1) and 18(4)
107(2003)DLT691
Manmohan Singh, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. The present judgment disposes of CM(M) No. 303/1993, CM(M) No. 327/1993 and CM(M) No. 313/1996, since they arise out of a common set of facts between the parties and relate to 3 different...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarda Plywood Industries Ltd. Vs. Tac Construction Materials Ltd. and ...
Delhi
Sep-12-2003
Commercial
Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 9, 11, 12(1), 18(1) and 18(4)
107(2003)DLT687; 2003(27)PTC391(Del)
Manmohan Singh, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Whether the mark 'DURACEM' used as a trade mark in respect of non-metallic building materials included in Class 19 so nearly resembles the words 'DUROPLY, DUROBORD, DUROMAC, DURODERBY and DUROTEAK in respect of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »