Advanced Search Results

Kalpana Rani Vs. the State of Bihar and Others

Court : Patna

Subject : Education

This Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent preferred by the respondent no.9 arises from the judgment and order dated 16th September 2010 passed by the learned single Judge in CWJC No.12054 of 2010. The...

Indore Development Authority and Etc. Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Kapur

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.9036­9038 OF2016INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..PETITIONER(S) VERSUS MANOHAR LAL & ORS. ETC. ..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.19532­19533 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.9798­9799 OF2016SPECIAL...

S.A. Sinha Metropolitan Magistrate Vs. Dr. Leo Rebello

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

V.M. Kanade, J. 1. This is a case where the respondent/contemnor who is an accused charged for offences punishable under sections 354, 337, 509, 323, 504 I.P.C. has persistently harassed, intimidated, threatened the learned Metropolitan Magistrate...

S.K. Mutreja Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT499; 2005(82)DRJ380

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Gupta, Adv

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The Petitioner has prayed inter alias for the quashing of the appointment of Cmde. R.B. Prabhavalkar, Respondent No.5 as the Director (Operations) in Goa Shipyard Ltd., Goa, viz. Respondent No.4. This is the...

Subrata Roy Sahara Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Gopal Subramanium

“REPORTABLE” IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.57 OF2014Subrata Roy Sahara …. Petitioner versus Union of India and others …. Respondents JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.I. Should we be hearing...

Sheikhah Fadiah Saad Al-abdullah Al-sabah Vs. Sanjay Mishrimal Punamiy ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Order: 1. The plaintiff has given notice of this application to be moved before this Court for ad interim relief today. The notice has been served on 2nd May, 2014. 2. Soon after the notice...

Dr. Rajendra Kumar and ors. Vs. the Govt. of National Capital Territor ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : 2006(92)DRJ556

Advocate for Appellant : C. Mohan Rao, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 joined as Senior Scientific Officers on deputation with the Forensic Science Laboratory of Govt of NCT. Petitioners are aspirants for the post of Assistant Directors in their respective...

Collector of Customs and Central Vs. Talwar Diamonds

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1986)(8)LC416Tri(Delhi)

1. The only question which requires to be decided in this appeal which is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 15-CH/G/84 dated 10.9.84 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), New Delhi in C.No.APPL/DLH/CH/G/1/84, is whether the...

Sh. Chander Vijay Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh District Board Act - Sections 71 and 90; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 112(2004)DLT437; 2004(75)DRJ451

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Adv. and; S.K. Makkar, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner appeared and qualified for the Central Civil Service Examination 2002, conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Petitioner being a `Jat' by caste and a resident of Rajasthan had applied for...

Atul Ltd. Vs. D.L.F. Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Reported in : (2001)10SCC35

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Seth

M.Jagannadha Rao and; A.P. Misra, JJ.1. These SLPs have been preferred against the order of the High Court dated 13-7-1999 whereby the High Court admitted FAO No. 37 of 1999 and directed that the hearing should...