Advanced Search Results
Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Kolkata
Apr-13-1951
Criminal
West Bengal Black Marketing Act, 1948 - Section 3(3); ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 517
AIR1952Cal90,55CWN470
Manmatha Nath Das and ; Manishi Das, Advs.
1. Of the present petitioners, one was put up on trial for an offence under Section 3 (1) and the other two for offence under Section 3 (1) read with Section 6, West Bengal Black Marketing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaresh Chandra Bose Vs. Bhupendra Narayan Sinha
Kolkata
May-12-1949
TenancyCivil
Bengal Tenancy Act, 1885 - Sections 3(13), 168, 168A and 168A(1)
AIR1950Cal15,54CWN243
Benoy Behari Sen, Adv.
K.C. Chunder, J.1. These are three appeals arising out of three execution proceedings of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Murshidabad. In two of them, there was an appeal to the District Judge who modified...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBanku B. Das Vs. Kashi N. Das and anr.
Kolkata
Aug-06-1962
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Section 284; ;Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1914 - Rules 28 and 30; ;Hindu Law
AIR1963Cal85,67CWN258
S. Deb, Adv.
ORDERP.C. Mallick, J. 1. This is a proceeding in which BankuBehari Das seeks to propound the Will of his fatherManmatha Nath Das. The Will is dated August 20,1960. The Will is being contested by Kasliinath andHem...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Saroj Kumar Chakravarty and ors. Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Mar-24-1932
Criminal
AIR1932Cal474
Panckridge, J.1. The appellants in this case are three out of five young men who have been tried by the learned Sessions Judge of Backerganj and a jury of five persons. The appellants, together with one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBankim Chandra Paira and anr. Vs. Anand Bazar Patrika and anr.
Kolkata
Sep-05-1949
Criminal
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2 and 3
AIR1950Cal129
Manmatha N. Das and ;Manishi K.R. Das, Advs. for Editor, Printer and Publisher of "Swaraj O Sangathan." and ;Chandra S. Sen and ;Jajneswar Majumdar, Advs. for the Province;S.K. Das and ;Benode B. Hala
Lahiri, J.1. This Rule was issued upon the Editor, Printer and Publisher of the Ananda Bazar Fatrika and the Swaraj O Sangathan to show cause why they should not be committed for contempt for publications in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›