Advanced Search Results
Sayaji Iron and Engg. Co. Vs. Cit
Gujarat
Jul-25-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)172CTR(Guj)339
Manish Shah for J.P. Shah, for the Assessee Manish R. Bhatt & Bharat Naik, for the Revenue
A.R. Dave, J.At the instance of the assessee, the following question has been referred to this court for its opinion under the provisions of section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayaji Iron and Engg. Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Gujarat
Jul-25-2001
Direct Taxation
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 198 and 309; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37, 254 and 255
[2002]108CompCas675(Guj); [2002]253ITR749(Guj)
Manish Shah, Adv. for; J.P. Shah, Adv.
A. R. Dave, J. 1. At the instance of the assessee, the following question has been referred to this court for its opinion, under the provisions of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaira Dist. Co-op. Milk Producer Union Ltd. Vs. Cit
Gujarat
Jul-04-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN473(Guj)
Manish Shah and J.P. Shah, for the Assessee Tanvish U. Bhatt for the Revenue
M.S. Shah, J.In this reference at the instance of the assessee, the following questions are referred for our opinion in respect of the assessment year 1976-77 :'1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union Of India Vs. Rajeev Bansal
Supreme Court of India
Oct-03-2024
Education
RAJ BAHADUR YADAV __
2024 INSC754Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 Union of India & Ors. … Appellants Versus Rajeev Bansal …Respondent WITH C.A. No.8631/2024 C.A. No.9270/2024 C.A. No.8632/2024 C.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishorkumar Prabhudas Tanna and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat Through Secr ...
Gujarat
Dec-29-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 49 and 49(2); Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Sections 2(12), 15 and 100; Khadi and Village Industries Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 15; Bombay General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 21; Gujarat Khadi and Village Industries (Amendment) Act, 2006; Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003; Bombay Khadi and Village Industries Act, 1960 - Sections 11 and 13(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 299; Gujarat Value Added Tax Rules, 2006; Central Excise Rules, 1944
(2009)1GLR683; (2009)23VST298(Guj)
S.N. Shelat, Sr. Adv. and; P.A. Mehd, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and;
Rajesh H. Shukla, J.1. This group of petitions have been filed by the petitioners for the prayers, inter alia, that a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Jagdish Processors P. Ltd.
Gujarat
Aug-29-2000
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A(8) and 256(1)
[2001]252ITR755(Guj)
Akil Kureshi, Adv. for; Manish R. Bhatt, Adv.
A.R. Dave, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question has been referred to this court for its opinion under the provisions of Sec-tion 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Vs. Mira Industries
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Apr-25-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)87ITD475(Ahd.)
1. These are many cases involving the interpretation of Sections 80HH and 80-I. They were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. Besides raising some interpretational aspects and rules of consistency, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.G. Gajjar and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Wealth Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Sep-30-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)93ITD624(Ahd.)
1. The prime controversy in this bunch of 39 appeals revolves around the taxability of value of stock exchange membership card of Ahmedabad Stock Exchange under the WT Act, 1957. Consequent peripheral issues have also been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Arvind Mills Ltd.
Gujarat
Nov-07-2014
Direct Taxation
K.S. Jhaveri, J. 1. The following two questions have been referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising out of the Tribunal's order dated 30.07.1997 in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDahod Sahakari Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Gujarat
Jul-12-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 41(1), 253, 253(1), 253(2), 253(3), 253(4), 256(1), 271(1) and 274; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 46A; Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 - Rule 27
(2006)200CTR(Guj)265; [2006]282ITR321(Guj)
Manish J. Shah, Adv. for; J.P. Shah, Adv.
D.A. Mehta, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench SB has referred the following two questions out of six questions proposed by the assessee applicant under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »