Advanced Search Results

Joint Commissioner of Police and ors. Vs. Sube Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17(1), 18, 21 and 23; All India Services Act, 1951 - Sections 3(1); Indian Police Service (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955; Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1980 - Rules 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 6 and 23(6); Customs Act, 1962; Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 311; Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980 - Rule 3(1); General Clauses Act - Sections 17, 18 and 19

Reported in : 2002VIIAD(Delhi)539; 99(2002)DLT37

Advocate for Appellant : Maninder Singh,; George Paracken and; V.K. Tandon, Advs

S.B. Sinha, C.J. 1. Whether Joint Commissioner of Police can be a disciplinary authority of the respondents of the writ petitions, is the question involved in this batch of writ petitions which arise out of judgment...

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. R.J. Shah and Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1999(2)ARBLR316(SC); JT1999(3)SC151; (1999)3MLJ53(SC); 1999(2)SCALE570; (1999)4SCC214; [1999]2SCR643; MANU/SC/0266/1999

Advocate for Appellant : Maninder Singh, Adv

ORDERB.N. Kirpal, J.1. Having failed before the High Court in getting the non-speaking award of the arbitrators set aside the appellant has filed the present appeal by special leave with the expectation that it will be...

Malay Ganguly Vs. Medical Council of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Reported in : 2003(10)SCALE361; (2002)10SCC93

B.N. Kirpal,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Ashok Bhan, JJ.Mr. Maninder Singh, counsel for Respondent 1 has drawn our attention to some of the salient provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956It may be desirable that...

integrated Fire Protection Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Director of Purchase Air Head ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : CommercialCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(61)DRJ779; 2002(144)ELT530(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi, Sr. Adv. and; Krishna Kumar, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. The main dispute involved in this petition revolves around the interpretation of the clause relating to the Customs Duty Exemption (hereinafter referred to as 'CDE') in the tender submitted by the petitioner in...

K.K. Sethi (Major) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)609; 76(1998)DLT925; 1999(48)DRJ349

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.P. Singh, Adv

ORDERVijender Jain, J. 1. This writ petition raises the question of applicability of the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in Balram Gupta Vs . Union of India & Another : (1987)IILLJ541SC to the case...

Manu Tentiwal and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Kirtiman Singh, T. Singh Dev, Zartab Anwar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Amit Anand, A.K. Behera, Advocates.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A) 1. Six applicants who are direct recruits of Indian Revenue Service (IRS) appointed on 01.09.2003, have joined together in the present OA, having been aggrieved by the action of the...

Shyam Telelink Limited Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: RAMJI SRINIVASAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, RITU BHALLA, JASLEEN K. OBEROI, MONARK SALHOT, ADVOCATE. FOR THE RESPONDENT: MANINDER SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE, WITH MRS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, YOGIND

S.B. Sinha These two petitions being inter-related were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. However, the fact of the matter would be noticed by us separately in each...

Wire and Wireless India Limited (Earlier Known as Siti Cable Network L ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONERS: MANINDER SINGH, YOGINDER HANDOO, KUNAL SOOD, MANISIMRAN SINGH, ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENT: RAKESH DWIVEDI, SR. ADVOCATE WITH, VIKAS MEHTA, VIBHAV SRIVASTAVA, ADVOCATES.

The Appellant in this case has challenged certain provisions of the “Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Second Amendment) Regulation 2006 (9 of 2006)”dated 24th August, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the Amendment Regulation). On 10.12.2004,the...

Dominant Offset Private Ltd. Vs. Adamovske Strojirny

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34(2)

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)717; AIR2000Delhi254; 84(2000)DLT594; 2000(54)DRJ523

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Maninder Singh and; Ms. K. Pratibha Singh, Advs

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The appeal is directed against the order dated 18.4.1998 passed by the Hon'ble Arbitrator on the application filed by the appellant under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2. The...

Kumarina Investment Ltd Vs. Digital Media Convergence Ltd. and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: C.S. VAIDYANATHAN, SR. ADVOCATE, MANJUL BAJPAI, ASHISH YADAV ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: MANINDER SINGH, SR. ADVOCATE, MRS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, MS. NITYA THAKUR, ARJUN NATRAJAN,

S. B. Sinha Introduction: An interesting question involving ‘choice of law’ and ‘choice of forum’ choosing the English law of contract and London courts as the forum, under a contract entered into by and between the...