Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: manikappa patil · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2003

Basamma Vs. Taluk Legal Services Committee and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 - Sections 19(5), 20(1), 20(3) and 20(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 15, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2003Kant242; 2003(2)KarLJ439

Advocate for Appellant : Manikappa Patil, Adv.

ORDERH. Rangavittalachar, J. 1. Petitioner is the mother. 2nd respondent is her daughter. It is the property right which has taken a better hold against the natural affection of the mother and daughter in this case....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1998

Shankerappa Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-1998

Subject : Insurance

Reported in : 2000ACJ709

Advocate for Appellant : Manikappa Patil, Adv.

Chidananda Ullal, J.1. This appeal is filed by the owner of the vehicle to challenge the judgment and award dated 15.1.1993 in MVC No. 51 of 1987 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bidar (District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2007

Smt. Gurusiddawwa W/O Annaraya and Smt. Nagamma W/O Mallikarjuna Vs. t ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-13-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 4 and 48A

Reported in : 2007(3)KarLJ250; 2007(4)AIRKarR541

Advocate for Appellant : Lakshmeesha, Adv. for ;Manikappa Patil, Adv.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. However enlarged a meaning and interpretation is given to Section 4 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), I am still unable to comprehend with the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 23 1998

Nirmala Bai and anr. Vs. Ashok and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-23-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2000ACJ1163

Advocate for Appellant : Manikappa Patil, Adv.

Hari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. Both appeals arise from one common judgment and order dated 26.9.1997 delivered by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarding compensation to the tune of Rs. 1,00,367 in favour of the claimants-respondents. Feeling...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2002

M. Arjundas Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-28-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 12, 12(3), 12(5), 14, 19 and 77; Karnataka Lokayuktha Act, 1984 - Sections 7 and 7(2A); Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 - Rules 8, 10A, 11, 14A and 14A(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Lokayuktha Rules, 1985 - Rule 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4785

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Visweswara, Adv.

ORDERA.V. Srinivasa Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing of the order passed by respondent No. 3 in No. COMPT/ LOK/ BCD-127/99-2000 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2000

Union of India and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-21-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(1) and 54(1); Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 19

Reported in : 2001(4)KarLJ410

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Ashok Haranahalli, Adv

ORDER1. This case has come up for admission. By consent of both the parties, it is taken for final disposal.2. The lands measuring 36 guntas in Sy. No. 347/1 situated in Navbad, Bidar District were acquired...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 1998

Srinivas Rao Vs. Dattatrayarao and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-02-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151, 153 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 8, Rule 6-A(1)

Reported in : 1998(5)KarLJ212

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Brijesh Chand Guru ;for Sri S.R. Shivaprakash, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 27th September, 1993, whereby the learned Munsiff, Bidar has allowed the application under Order VI, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (LA....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2004

Santosh Alias Santoshayya Shantayya Hiremath Vs. Hubli-dharwad Municip ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-27-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Karnataka Civil Services Act, 1978 - Sections 3 and 8; ; Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996 - Rule 3 and 3(2); ; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Gurumath, Adv.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This writ petition is filed by a person, who claims to be the adopted son of a former employee, who was working as Sanitary Health Inspector in Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation and who...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2008

Dada Rao S/O Gyanoba Since Deceased by Lrs (Prabhavathi W/O. Venkat Ra ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1966; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 42, Rule 25

Advocate for Appellant : B.C. Rajeeva, Adv. for G.S. Visweswara Associates

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This second appeal is by the sole defendant in O.S. No. 129/93 on the file of the Civil Judge, Basavakalyan, who has suffered a decree in favour of the plaintiffs declaring that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2003

Smt. Bhimavva and ors. Vs. Shankar @ Adya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-14-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 146, 147, 147(1) and 167; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 94 and 95

Reported in : 2003ACJ1829; AIR2004Kant58; ILR2003KAR3538; 2004(2)KarLJ166

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Shankar, Sr. Counsel, ;Basavaraj Kareddy, ;Manikappa Patil, ;A.K. Bhat and ;B.R. Vishwanath, Advs.

ORDER ON REFERENCE Question for determination: What is the extent of liability of the Insurance Company to indemnify the owner under Act policy against the compensation awarded by MACT under the Motor Vehicles Act, in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial