Advanced Search Results
Amar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
May-04-2016
Criminal
Mr. R.K.Tiwari, Mr. Y.B.Mandpe
Swapna Joshi, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction dated 24.9.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge6 Nagpur in S.T. No.612/2011 thereby convicting the appellant (ori. accd.No.1-Sumit s/o Ramesh Chintalwar and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
Sep-28-2015
Criminal
Shri. Mandpe
Oral Judgment: 1. Exception is taken to the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 130 of 2012 Dt.29-4-2014 by which the appellant is convicted for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Govinda S/O Ganpat Motghare,
Mumbai
Apr-13-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302
(2007)109BOMLR887; 2007CriLJ2564
Y.B. Mandpe, APP
K.J. Rohee, J. 1. The State has preferred this appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (hereinafter referred to as ''the accused'') of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Maharashtra Vs. Manohar
Mumbai
Oct-20-2004
CriminalFamily
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 32, 302 and 307
I(2005)DMC816
Mandpe, A.P.P.
P.S. Brahme, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mandpe, learned A.P.P. and Mrs. Sirpurkar, learned Counsel for the respondent-accused.2. This criminal appeal is against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati on 30.12.1991 in Sessions Case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Chimanlal Giopalji Dhruwamalkan
Mumbai
Aug-04-2004
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 2(1)L, 7, 16, 16(1), 23(1A) and 24(2)
2005CriLJ1890
Y.B. Mandpe, A.P.P.
P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard learned A. P. P. Mr. Mandpe, for the appellant and Ms. Gayatri Joshi, Advocate holding for Mr. Purohit Advocate for Respondent.The respondent was convicted of the offences punishable under Section 2(i-a)(m) read...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFood Inspector Vs. Balkisan Bansilal Chandak and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-03-2004
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 13(2), 14, 16 and 17; ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 14, 16, 16(1) and 145
2005CriLJ1680
Y.B. Mandpe, A.P.P.
P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. Mandpe, learned A.P.P. for the appellant and Mr. A.V. Bhide, learned Advocate for the respondents.These two appeals are directed against the judgment and order of acquittal of respondents of offence under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Rasul and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-30-2007
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306 and 498A
I(2008)DMC358
Y.B. Mandpe, Addl. Public Prosecutor
C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. This is an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment delivered by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, whereby she acquitted both the accused of the offences punishable under Sections 306, 498A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer Vs. Suhas S/O ...
Mumbai
Aug-06-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 161; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)
(2005)107BOMLR982
Y.B. Mandpe, A.P.P.
P.S. Brahme, J.1. Heard Mr. Mandpe, learned A.P.P., for the appellant and Mr. Abhijit Deshpande, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed on 31.5.1991 by Special Judge, Amravati...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDnyaneshwar Sopanrao Bhandare Vs. State of Maharashtra Through the Sec ...
Mumbai
Nov-06-2009
Service
Nagpur City Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 46, 50(1), 53(2), 53(5), 59 and 387(3); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 56; Maharashtra Civil Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rules 5, 6, 7, 7(2), 8, 8(23) and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 169; Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 311
2010(1)BomCR152
A.S. Chandurkar, Adv.
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Writ Petition is to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself as per orders dated 12th June 2008. Accordingly, we have heard Shri Chandurkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal Ziblaji Sonone Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Police Stat ...
Mumbai
Jan-15-2008
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306 and 498A
(2008)110BOMLR434
A.S. Manohar, Adv.
K.J. Rohee, J.1. The appellant has challenged his conviction for the offences punishable under Section 498A and 306 of IPC and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and fine of Rs. 500/-for the former offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »