Advanced Search Results

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dhali and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Reported in : 1992ACJ1057

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Bhansali, Adv.

Milap Chandra Jain, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Banner, dated April 27, 1989, by which it has awarded Rs. 1,17,400/- as compensation to the claimant-respondent Nos....

Ram Chandra Vs. Laxman Das and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1961]12STC367(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : Manakmal, Adv.

L.N. Chhangani, J. 1. These two revision petitions have been preferred by the petitioner Ramchandra against the identical orders passed by the Civil Judge, Jodhpur, on 17th October, 1959, in two Civil Original Cases Nos. 77...

Manakchand Vs. Pannalal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1951Raj152

Advocate for Appellant : Roshanlal, Adv.; Ramratan and; Pannalal Jain, Advs.

ORDERNawalkishore, J.1. The only question calling for determination in this revn. is whether the learned Dist. J. was competent in law to direct Manakchand petnr. to deposit the sum of Rs. 1482/8/- on account of rent...

Laxmichand Vs. Gokal Prasad and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 38, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR1951Raj67

Advocate for Appellant : Manakmal, Adv.

Nawalkishore, J.1. This is a pltf's appeal against the judgment of the learned Dist J., Jodhpur, holding that the terms of surety bond did not make the surety liable in the execution proceedings. The facts relating...

Premraj Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 252(2), 254, 256 and 256(1)

Reported in : AIR1952Raj55

Advocate for Appellant : Manakmal, Adv.

ORDERTrilochan Dutt, J.1. The case, out of which this revision petition has arisen, is pending in the Court of the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Banner. A criminal case under Sections 379. 414 and 409 was registered on 20th...

Samdu Khan Vs. the Rajasthan State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 17; Rajasthan Public Demands Recovery Act, 1952 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1957Raj277

Advocate for Appellant : Manakmal, Adv.

ORDERModi, J.1. This is a revision by the plaintiff Samdukhan against an order of the Additional Civil Judge, Jodhpur, directing that the plaintiff's suit being one for a declaration plus consequential relief, he should pay ad...

Mangilal Vs. Sitaram

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan (Criminal) General Rules, 1952 - Rule 144 and 144(3); Civil General Rules, 1952 - Rule 234; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12

Reported in : AIR1957Raj339; 1957CriLJ1314

Advocate for Appellant : Manakmal, Adv.

ORDERDave, J.(1) This is an application in revision by Mangilal applicant against the order of the District Magistrate, Jodhpur, dated the 16th of October 1956 dismissing his appeal on the ground of limitation.(2) The facts giving...

Ganga Bishan and ors. Vs. Jai Narain

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Articles 30 and 31

Reported in : AIR1986SC441; 1985(2)SCALE1101; (1986)1SCC75

E.S. Venkataramiah, J.1. This appeal by certificate is filed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Rajasthan in Regular First Appeal No. 43 of 1962, dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants...

Kundan Mal and ors. Vs. Thikana Siryari and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101 - Order 6, Rule 17; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR1959Raj146

Advocate for Appellant : Manak Mal, Adv.

K.K. Sharma, J. 1. This is an appeal against the appellate judgment and decree or the learned Civil Judge, Sojat in a suit for perpetual injunction and damages against the defendant-respondents. The plaintiff's suit was that...