Advanced Search Results
Pitambar Das Vs. Rajmata Srimati Shanti Devi
Himachal Pradesh
Jul-30-1956
Civil
Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 36 and 61 - Schedule - Article 1; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 13, Rule 4; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Section 19
AIR1957HP23
Man Mohan Nath, Adv.
Ramabhadran, J.C. 1. The suit, out of which this second appeal by a defendant, has arisen, has had a chequered career. Rajmata Shanti Devi of Bushahr instituted a suit against Pitambar Das (the appellant in this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanyukt Nirmata Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Oct-24-1994
ArbitrationCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14
59(1995)DLT338
M.M. Sareen and; V.K. Sharma, Advs
Usha Mehra, J. (1) By this application under Older 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short Civil Procedure Code the Delhi Development Authority (in short 'DDA') wants the decree, passed by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManmohan Das and ors. Vs. BahauddIn and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-11-1957
Property
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52 and 100; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 11 and 38 - Order 7, Rule 6 - Order 8, Rule 2 - Order 34, Rule 1; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 28 - Schedule - Articles 102, 110, 116, 131 and 132; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 39; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58
AIR1957All575
Gopi Nath Kunzru, ;G. Mehrotra and ;Amar Nath Kaul, Advs.
Brij Mohan Lall, J. 1. This and the connected First Appeal No. 435 of 1943 are defendants' appeals arising out of the same judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge of Allahabad. This appeal was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. B.N. Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others
Allahabad
Jul-14-1999
Service
Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, (ICFRE) Rules - Rules 31, 33 and 34; AIS (DCRB) Rules, 1958 - Rule 5A; Recruitment Rules
1999(3)AWC2615
Umesh Narain Sharma and ;Man Mohan Das Agarwal, Advs.
S. H. A. Raza and Krishna Kumar, JJ.1. The petitioner who belongs to Indian Forest Services, initially was appointed on deputation as Director in the cadre of Scientist 'H'. In the Indian Council of Forestry Research...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKalindi Medicure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Oct-04-2006
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Trade Marks Act, 1999; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 39 Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4
136(2007)DLT200; 2007(34)PTC18(Del)
Man Mohan, Sr. Adv.,; Binny Kalra and; Ishan Sahiwal, A
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. On 6.9.2006 while issuing summons in the suit, taking cognizance of IA. No. 9988/06 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC, following ex-parte ad-interim order was passed:1. Notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Ratanchand Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-27-1990
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 2(31) and 264; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956
(1991)93CTR(AP)202; [1990]186ITR475(AP)
D. Man Mohan, Adv.
V. Sivaraman Nair, J.1. The petitioner was a member of a Hindu undivided family consisting of his father and brothers. He had received two gifts of rupees five thousand each from his grandparents in May, 1965....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommittee of Management, S.D.P.G. College, Muzaffarnagar and ors. Vs. ...
Allahabad
Oct-16-2001
ConstitutionElection
Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973 - Sections 2(13), 9, 13(1), 19, 60A, 68 and 69; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Specific Relief Act
2001(4)AWC3194; (2002)1UPLBEC636
Man Mohan Mittal and ;B.S. Bedi, Advs.
Anjani Kumar, J. 1. By means of this writ petition, the committee of management Sanatan Dharm Post Graduate College, Muzaffarnagar has challenged the order dated August 14, 2001 (Annexure-17 to the writ petition), passed by Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManmohan Das Vs. Mt. Radha Rani and ors.
Allahabad
May-01-1944
Civil
AIR1944All288
Sinha, J.1. This is an appeal by one of the judgment-debtors, Lala Man Mohan Das, against an order passed under Section 47, Civil, P.C., whereby his objection to execution was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Lal Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Nov-09-1976
CriminalExcise
1976WLN681
Mr. S.N. Bhargava
M.L. Shrimal, J.1. The petitioner Nathu Lal and one Man Mohan were tried before the Assistant Collector and Magistrate, First Class, Ajmer, under Section 64 of the Rajasthan Excise Act 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHotel Manasasarovar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-22-1994
Direct Taxation
Expenditure Tax Act, 1987 - Sections 2 to 5, 7 and 15; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)
(1995)123CTR(AP)576; [1995]213ITR668(AP)
M.V.K. Murthy, Adv.
M.N. Rao, J.1. The constitutionality of the amendments made to sections 2 - 5, 7 and 15 of the Expenditure Tax Act, 1987 (for short, 'the Act'), by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991, is under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »