Advanced Search Results

Sangita JaIn (Smt.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj359

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Manish Bhandari, Shri. Mahendra Singh, Shri. Sandeep Saxena

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. All the aforesaid writ petitions although have been filed with different prayers and are founded on different legal grounds but since they pertain to the same process of selection for appointment on the...

Mahendra Singh Jaggi Vs. Dataram Jagannath

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 10 and 19

Reported in : AIR1997SC1219; 84(1997)CLT663(SC); JT1997(1)SC505; 1997(1)SCALE327; (1998)9SCC28

ORDER1. Leave granted in all these special leave petitions.2. By consent of parties the appeals arising from these special leave petitions were heard finally and are being disposed of by this judgment as common questions are...

Than Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 163 and 164

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2692

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Shah and; Shambhoo Singh, Advs.

O.P. Bishnoi, J.1. These three appeals have been filed by the three appellants Than Singh, Gulab Singh and Ramesh against a judgment dated 23.9.2000 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bali, whereby, all the three have...

Daryao Singh Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1952All59

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Raina, Adv.

Bind Basni Prasad, J.1. This judgment will govern criminal Appeals Nos. 448 of 1950 and 233 of 1951. They arise out of the same occurrence. The judgments are two, because one of the accused was absconding...

Pooran Chandra Rastogi Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 161; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act - Sections 3(3), 9A(2) and 44; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2430

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Mehrotra and ;S.K. Singh, Advs.

S.H.A. Raza, J.1. This is a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 7-12-1982 passed by Sri R. K. Khanna, Special Judge, Anti-Corruption (West), U.P., Luck-now in Case No. 11 of 1974 State v. P.C....

Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios, S.A. Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasa ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Contract

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2757

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mahendra Singh

Prem Shanker Asopa, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Cobra Instalaciones Y Servicios, S.A. (in short 'the petitioner- company') is seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to declare that the petitioner-company possesses the qualifying...

Gavinolla Srinivas vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Akshay Mann, Mr. Akshay Khaiwal, Mr. Mahendra Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13211/2022 GAVINOLLA SRINIVAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Mann, Mr Akshay Khaiwal, Mr. Mahendra Singh, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Counsel for UOI...

N.K.R. Arunachalam Chettiar Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Subject : FERA

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Singh for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.

Sarvesh Chandra, Chairman. - This appeal has arisen out of the Adjudication Order No. SDE(R)IV/17/91, dated 24-7-1991 under which a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs has been imposed on the appellant for contravention of section 14...

Parasmal JaIn Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Singh for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.

Chandra, Chairman - This appeal is directed against Adjudication Order No. SDE(R)/IV/127 of 1990, dated 11-5-1990 under which a penalty of Rs.3,75,000 has been imposed on the appellant for contravention of sections 9(1)(a), 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d),...

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

Advocate for Appellant : Rafique Dada, Sr. Adv. and ;Birendra Saraf, Adv., i/b., I.C. Legal, Adv. in W.P. (L) No. 2528/2008, ;R.M. Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.S. Masurkar and ;D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleaders in W.P. (L) No. 25

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule in both the Writ Petitions. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, Rule called out and heard finally at the admission stage itself.Facts2. The State of Maharashtra vide its order...