Advanced Search Results
Hemchand M. Singhania Vs. Shakuntala S. Tiwari (Smt.)
Mumbai
Nov-28-1986
TenancyLimitation
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 - Schedule - Articles 66, 67 and 113; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 10, 106, 108 and 111; Constitution of India - Article 226
1987(2)BomCR428
H.C. Tunara and ;A.G. Parekh, Advs. in W.P. 5391/85 and ;M.H. Shah, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;M.K. Shah, ;S.R. Chitnis and ;M.H. Munshi, Advs. in W.P. 5515/85
V.S. Kotwal, J.1. Ice-cream may be a delight for taste, but it has landed its manufacturer in hot waters and all the said delight has been practically evaporated when engulfed in blunt legal contest. This, though...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operation Housing Society Lt ...
Mumbai
Mar-11-1988
Trusts and SocietiesProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 1976; ; Constitution of India - Article 215
1988(3)BomCR238
F.S. Nariman, ; R.A. Dada, ; B.R. Zaiwalla, ; F.E. Divetri and ; R.F. Nariman, Advs., i/b., Payne and Co.
V.V. Vaze, J.1. To no man we shall deny justice', promised King John at Runnymede, beside the River Thames, on 14th June, 1215 which promise along with others became the great Chapter of English liberty. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Dosibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy, Represented by (Byram Nanabhoy Jeeje ...
Mumbai
Jan-20-2009
Property
Transfer of Property Act; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 28, 259 and 260; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 58; Cantonments Act, 1924; Government of India Act, 1935; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Cantonment Code, 1912
2009(4)BomCR476; 2009(111)BomLR1014
Mahendra Shah, Sr. Adv., ;K. Presswalla and ;Rajesh Rathod, Advs., i/b., Bilawala & Company
P.B. Majmudar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th September, 1991, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division at Pune, in Special Civil Suit No. 287 of 1983. By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Damodar Prasad Vs. R.S.R.T.C. and ors.
Rajasthan
Jul-02-2001
Service
(2001)IILLJ1591Raj; 2001(4)WLN120
Mahendra Shah, Adv.
Lakshmanan, C.J.(1). Heard Mr. Mahendra Shah, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in all the appeals. These appeals have been filed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFrancis Joseph Rebellow Vs. Olivia Jane Rebellow and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-05-1981
Commercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2 and 2(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 5; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 106; Partnership Act
AIR1981Bom234
Mahendra Shah,;S.G. Page,;K.J. Abhyankar and;C.I. Chamboowala, Advs.
1. These First Appeals are directed against the decree passed by the Bombay City Civil Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit relating to accounts in respect of the partnership business etc. First Appeal No, 174 of 1980...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLokesh Meena and Etc. Vs. Malviya Regional Engineering College, Jaipur ...
Rajasthan
Mar-19-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226
AIR1998Raj312; 1998(2)WLC638
Mahendra Shah,; Anupama Chaturvedi and; Manish Bhandari
ORDERGyan Sudha Misra, J.1. All the petitioners herein who were applicants for Pre-Engineering Test (PET for short), 1997 along with large number of other students who could not have attained the age of 17 years on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-27-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 132, 132A, 132A(1), 132B, 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 133, 133A, and 271(1); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 292C
(2009)224CTR(Bom)409
K. Shivram and ;A.R. Singh, Advs.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. The appeal was admitted on 1st April, 2004 on the following substantial question of law:Whether the addition of Rs. 20 lacs as an income-tax advance said to have been made by the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEscorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Nov-09-1984
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 28, 47, 81, 111, 111(2), 165, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 184, 210, 284, 284(3), 284(4), 301, 391, 392, 393, 394, 433 and 637; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 35A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 19(5), 21, 21(2), 21(3), 28, 28(1), 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(4), 30, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 50, 56, 57, 61(2), 73, 73(3) and 75
[1985]57CompCas241(Bom)
Mr. Nariman
Madhava Reddy, C.J.1. The questions that arise for consideration in this writ petition filed by Escorts Ltd. and its shareholder and managing director are quite unique and important. The decision thereon may affect not only the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Vivekanand Atmaram Chitale and Another Vs. Vidya Vardhini Sabha an ...
Mumbai
Jan-24-1984
Criminal
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10 and 12; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(4), 41A to 41E, 50, 51, 51(2) and 71; Societies Registration Act; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254 and 254(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules
1984MhLJ520
Shri. Singhvi
Jamdar, J.1. Writ Petition No. 3680 of 1983 filed by the Petitioners for seeking various reliefs against the Respondents was by an order passed on 21-10-1983 treated as a contempt petition under S. 10 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAafloat Textiles (India) Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs Overruled
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-05-2006
Customs
(2006)(104)ECC38
1. The above appeals arising out of common orders-in-original involve common issues and are hence heard together and disposed off by this common order.2. Vide the impugned order the Commissioner of Customs has confirmed a duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »