Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mahendra shah · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 28 1986

Hemchand M. Singhania Vs. Shakuntala S. Tiwari (Smt.)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-28-1986

Subject : TenancyLimitation

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 - Schedule - Articles 66, 67 and 113; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 10, 106, 108 and 111; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR428

Advocate for Appellant : H.C. Tunara and ;A.G. Parekh, Advs. in W.P. 5391/85 and ;M.H. Shah, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;M.K. Shah, ;S.R. Chitnis and ;M.H. Munshi, Advs. in W.P. 5515/85

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. Ice-cream may be a delight for taste, but it has landed its manufacturer in hot waters and all the said delight has been practically evaporated when engulfed in blunt legal contest. This, though...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1988

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operation Housing Society Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-1988

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 1976; ; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR238

Advocate for Appellant : F.S. Nariman, ; R.A. Dada, ; B.R. Zaiwalla, ; F.E. Divetri and ; R.F. Nariman, Advs., i/b., Payne and Co.

V.V. Vaze, J.1. To no man we shall deny justice', promised King John at Runnymede, beside the River Thames, on 14th June, 1215 which promise along with others became the great Chapter of English liberty. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2009

Mrs. Dosibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy, Represented by (Byram Nanabhoy Jeeje ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 28, 259 and 260; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 58; Cantonments Act, 1924; Government of India Act, 1935; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Cantonment Code, 1912

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR476; 2009(111)BomLR1014

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Shah, Sr. Adv., ;K. Presswalla and ;Rajesh Rathod, Advs., i/b., Bilawala & Company

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30th September, 1991, passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division at Pune, in Special Civil Suit No. 287 of 1983. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 2001

Damodar Prasad Vs. R.S.R.T.C. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-02-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ1591Raj; 2001(4)WLN120

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Shah, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J.(1). Heard Mr. Mahendra Shah, learned counsel appearing for the appellants in all the appeals. These appeals have been filed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1981

Francis Joseph Rebellow Vs. Olivia Jane Rebellow and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-05-1981

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2 and 2(2); Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 5; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 106; Partnership Act

Reported in : AIR1981Bom234

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Shah,;S.G. Page,;K.J. Abhyankar and;C.I. Chamboowala, Advs.

1. These First Appeals are directed against the decree passed by the Bombay City Civil Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit relating to accounts in respect of the partnership business etc. First Appeal No, 174 of 1980...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1998

Lokesh Meena and Etc. Vs. Malviya Regional Engineering College, Jaipur ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-19-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1998Raj312; 1998(2)WLC638

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Shah,; Anupama Chaturvedi and; Manish Bhandari

ORDERGyan Sudha Misra, J.1. All the petitioners herein who were applicants for Pre-Engineering Test (PET for short), 1997 along with large number of other students who could not have attained the age of 17 years on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2009

Surendra M. Khandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-27-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69, 132, 132A, 132A(1), 132B, 132(4), 132(4A), 132(5), 133, 133A, and 271(1); Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 292C

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Bom)409

Advocate for Appellant : K. Shivram and ;A.R. Singh, Advs.

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The appeal was admitted on 1st April, 2004 on the following substantial question of law:Whether the addition of Rs. 20 lacs as an income-tax advance said to have been made by the assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 1984

Escorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-09-1984

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 28, 47, 81, 111, 111(2), 165, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 184, 210, 284, 284(3), 284(4), 301, 391, 392, 393, 394, 433 and 637; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 35A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 19(5), 21, 21(2), 21(3), 28, 28(1), 29, 29(1), 29(2), 29(4), 30, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 50, 56, 57, 61(2), 73, 73(3) and 75

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Nariman

Madhava Reddy, C.J.1. The questions that arise for consideration in this writ petition filed by Escorts Ltd. and its shareholder and managing director are quite unique and important. The decision thereon may affect not only the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1984

Dr. Vivekanand Atmaram Chitale and Another Vs. Vidya Vardhini Sabha an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-1984

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10 and 12; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(4), 41A to 41E, 50, 51, 51(2) and 71; Societies Registration Act; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 235; Bihar and Orissa Co-operative Societies Act; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254 and 254(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules

Reported in : 1984MhLJ520

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Singhvi

Jamdar, J.1. Writ Petition No. 3680 of 1983 filed by the Petitioners for seeking various reliefs against the Respondents was by an order passed on 21-10-1983 treated as a contempt petition under S. 10 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2006

Aafloat Textiles (India) Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs Overruled

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-05-2006

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2006)(104)ECC38

1. The above appeals arising out of common orders-in-original involve common issues and are hence heard together and disposed off by this common order.2. Vide the impugned order the Commissioner of Customs has confirmed a duty...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial