Advanced Search Results
Mubeen Pasha Vs. the Managing Director, Bangalore Electricity Supply C ...
Karnataka
Aug-14-2009
Civil
Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 - Sections 5 and 12
2009(6)KarLJ396
Padmanabha Mahale, Sr. Counsel for R.V. Rarnesh Kumar Law Men's Company
ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. The petitioner is questioning the awarding of additional work in favour of the third respondent pursuant to Annexures-F1 to F16 and also for a writ of mandamus to the concerned respondents to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParayya Allayya Hittalamani Vs. Sri Parayya Gurulingayya Poojari and o ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-12-2007
Civil
Evidence Act - Sections 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100
AIR2008SC241; 2008(1)AWC1078(SC); JT2007(12)SC352; 2008(1)KarLJ353; (2008)2MLJ504(SC); 2008(1)LHSC547; 2007AIRSCW6654
S.K. Mahale and; Rajesh Mahale, Advs
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. There is a temple in the village Terdal under the Jharkhandi Taluk in the State of Karnataka, commonly known as 'Sri Prabhudeva Temple'. Parties hereto are the hereditary poojaris of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRazak Jinnesab Karajagi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Supreme Court of India
Apr-01-2009
Criminal
Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 378
JT2009(4)SC667; 2009(4)KarLJ1; 2009(5)SCALE116; 2009AIRSCW2417; 2009(2)LHSC1259; 2009(3)AIRKarR371
Rajesh Mahale,; Shivender Dwivedi and; Harish Hebbar, Ad
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Razak Jinnesab Karajagi [A-1], Jinnesab Rajesab Karajagi [A-2], Babulal Jinnesab Karajagi [A-3], Nabilal Jinnesab Karajagi [A-4] - appellants herein, have preferred this appeal under Section 2[1][a] of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S. Manohar Vs. E.K. Govindaraja Setty
Karnataka
Oct-05-1994
PropertyContract
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 63
ILR1994KAR3246; 1995(1)KarLJ81
V. Tarakaram, Senior Adv.
N.D.V. Bhat, J.1. This Appeal is preferred by the plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 24-9-1988 passed by the XIX Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore in O.S.No. 10381/1984. By the said judgment, the learned Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalimuddIn @ Jugan N. Ansari Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Sep-06-1999
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 41, 42, 43, 50, 51, 52(3), 54, 55 and 66(1)
2000(71)ECC425; (1999)3GLR699
R.V. Acharya, Adv.
M.S. Parikh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 30th June 1992 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City of Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 228/91. The appellant herein (for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBijay Deka Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Guwahati
Apr-13-2006
Commercial
Mr. S.K. Jain
B. Sudershan Reddy, C.J.1. Heard Mr. T.C. Khetri, learned senior counsel for the appellant.2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Sonitpur West Division invited tenders from intending bidders for settlement of Dhirai Sand and Gravel Mahal for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Manohar Gunaji Anubhawne Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Shri Ra ...
Mumbai
Aug-01-2003
Criminal
Companies Act - Sections 15, 630 and 630(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Code of Criminal Procedure - Sections 294, 465 and 482; ;Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1965 - Sections 37(1), 37(2) and 154; Bombay Rent Act; Presidency of the Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 41, 41(1) and 41(2); Development Control Regulations - Regulation 58 and 58(7); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 408 and 409; ;Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948; ;Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Public Premises Eviction Act; Income Tax Act - Sections 69; Jammu and Kashmir House and Shops Rent Control Act - Sections 4
[2004]120CompCas94(Bom); [2004(101)FLR269]; (2004)IILLJ680Bom; 2004(1)MhLj346; [2004]52SCL536(Bom)
Madhav Jamdar, Adv.
J.A. Patil, J.1. The petitioner was tried in Cri. Case No. 148/S/1994 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 13th Court, Dadar, Mumbai, who convicted him of the offence under Section 630 of the Companies Act and sentenced...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad Vs. G. Prem Raj
Supreme Court of India
Nov-19-2009
CriminalService
Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 2, 7, 11, 13(1), 13(2), 20 and 20(3)
AIR2010SC793; JT2009(14)SC321; 2009(14)SCALE92; (2010)1SCC398; 2009(6)LHSC3932; 2009AIRSCW7290
Naresh Kaushik,; Ranjana Narain,; P.K. Dey and;
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. In this Appeal, the judgment of the High Court, allowing the appeal of the respondent herein and acquitting him of the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) and Section 7...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKutub HusaIn Vs. Muhammad Abdul Kadir
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Civil
(1887)ILR9All136
Straight, J.1. These two appeals, Nos. 154 and 155 of 1886, relate to two suits which were instituted by the respondent, plaintiff, against the two defendants appellants on the 3rd August 1883.2. Both the Courts below...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDalganjan Singh Vs. Kalka Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Property
(1900)ILR22All1
Arthur Strachey, C.J.1. This appeal raises a question which has been discussed in many previous decisions of this Court, the effect of a perfect partition of a mahal under the North-Western Provinces Land Revenue Act, 1873,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »