Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: madan bhatia · Page 1 of about 133 results (0.075 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 08 1981

M/S. JaIn Malleables Vs. Bharat Sahay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-1981

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14-A and 14A(1); Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR1982SC71b; 1981(3)SCALE1817; (1982)1SCC149; [1982]2SCR53; 1982(14)LC90(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia,; Rajiv Behl and; Sushil Kumar, Advs

1 This appeal by special leave is directed against the one word order dated 1.2.1980 of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissing Civil Revision Petition No. 122 of 1980 in limine. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1971

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. R.N. Mehta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34 and 152

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi94

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Sethi,; Ravinder Sethi and; Madan Bhatia, Advs

T.V.R. Tatachari, J. (1) This Revision Petition has been filed by the Life Insurance Corporation of India, which has its northern zonal office at Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi, against an order, dated 18-4-1966, passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1986

Dewan Daulat Rai Kapur Vs. R. Chatha Ram and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-19-1986

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 227;

Reported in : 30(1986)DLT364

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia,; Vijay Kishan and; Raj Panjwan, Advs

G. C. Jain, J.(1) This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.(2) By means of a registered lease deed dated December 8, l978 the petitioner, Dewan Daulat Rai Kapur. let out his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1998

Om Parkash Kuthiala Vs. Dr. Sharad Rohtagi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 60, 61, 62 and 63; Court Fee Act - Sections 12(2)

Reported in : 1999(49)DRJ34

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Madan Bhatia, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. N. Pandey, Adv

ORDERS.N. Kapoor, J. 1. This appeal is directed against a decree for possession of Barsati Floor of House No. 51/3 (Original Road) Deshbandhu Gupta Road, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. 2. Briefly stated, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1981

JaIn Malleables Vs. Bharat Sahay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-1981

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14A; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971

Reported in : AIR1982SC71

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Madan Bhatia

Varadarajan J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the one word order dated 1.2.1980 of the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court dismissing Civil Revision Petition No. 122 of 1980 in limine....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1985

Ajay Kumar Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2(4) and 482

Reported in : 1986CriLJ932; 1986RLR41

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia,; P.P. Malhotra,; J.U. Khan,;

H.L. Anand, J. (1) The petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by Ajay Kumar, raises the question as to the validity and propriety of appointment of an Advocate of an aggrieved party...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 1997

Brakes International Vs. Tilak Raj Bagga and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-1997

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 44

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)553; AIR1998Delhi146; 1997(2)ARBLR264(Delhi); 67(1997)DLT882

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia,; Sandeep Sethi and; Mohan Vidhani, Advs

Jaspal Singh, J. (1) Although the various parts of the version put forth do not dovetail very well into one another, let me, in my own way, provide a graph of the events. M/s. Forward Auto...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2005

Children's Education Trust of India Vs. Union of India (UOi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8, 20 and 24(2); Delhi Education Rules, 1973 - Rules 51, 59, 59(2), 118 to 120, 180 and 181 to 185; Delhi School Education (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 123(2005)DLT20; 2005(84)DRJ110

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia, Sr. Adv.,; R.M. Sinha,; S.C. Pandey and;

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The question that arises in these writ petitions is whether the Central Academy Senior Secondary School, Delhi, the Management of which was taken-over under Section 20 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2000

R.K. Bali (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; The Dental Council Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Madan Bhatia Sr. Adv. and;Mr. Sandeep Sethi Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. In the above writ petition the election to the Presidentship of the Dental Council of India was challenged by the fourth respondent before the Govt. of India and the Govt. of India allowed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1972

Chander Kanta Vs. Khem Chand

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-20-1972

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 40; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 152

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi418

Advocate for Appellant : Madan Bhatia and; S.L. Bhatia, Advs

P.N. Khanna, J. (1) Smt. Chandra Kanta, the landlady, is the owner of the premises in dispute consisting of two portions; (a) one hall, store, part of a courtyard with a right to use the lobby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial