Advanced Search Results

S.K. Oil and Pulses Mill Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR668

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Paranjpe, ;S.M. Paranjpe and ;Ankush Bhalekar, Advs.

S.J. Deshpande, J.1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is a partnership firm established on 1st of March, 1980, and registered on 18th of...

Tatoba Ganu Vs. Tarabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 196; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101, 102, 103, 104 and 115; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54, 122, 355, 369 and 370; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Mitakshara Law; Indian Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 62 and 97; Mulla's Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1957Bom280; (1957)59BOMLR633; ILR1958Bom667

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Paranjpe, Adv.

Dixit, J.1. The only question argued in this appeal is about the effect of a deed of gift executed by one Balgonda in favour of plaintiff No. 1 on 9th June 1043. Mr. M. V. Paranjpe...

Jai Nath Wanchoo Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 73, 77, 77(3), 124, 124(2), 148, 145(2), 148(5), 154, 217(1), 218, 226, 229, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2), 313, and 324; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 - Rules 3, 3(1), 11, 14, 14(5), 15 and 15(4)(1); Government of India Act, 1935- Sections 240(1), 240(3) and 241; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 96-B, 96-B(1) and 96-B(2); Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919; Defence Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rules 14(3), 14(10), 14(14) and 15; Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948; Preventive Detention Act, 1950; Civil Services Regulations, 1920; Police Act - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1970Bom180; (1970)72BOMLR51; ILR1970Bom887

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singhavi and ;A.V. Sawant, Advs.

Madan, J.1. The Petitioner is a civilian in the defence services. He has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to set aside an order passed by the President of India terminating his services...

State Vs. Shankar Balaji Waje

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialCriminal

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1), 79 and 80

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1676; 1960CriLJ896; (1961)IILLJ8Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Goveronment Pleader

S.T. Desai, J.(1) This Reference by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nasik, raises the vexed question of the connotation of the expression 'employed' in S. 2(1) of the Factories Act which gives the interpretation of a 'worker.'...

S.B. Patwardhan and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 166 and 309

Reported in : AIR1977SC2051; 1977LabIC1367; (1977)3SCC399; [1977]3SCR775; 1977(1)SLJ457(SC)

Y.V. Chandrachud, J.1. This is a group of five appeals, one from Maharashtra and four from Gujarat. They involve substantially identical questions and since the appeal from the judgment of the Bombay High Court was argued...

Khivaraj Chhagniram Zavar and anr. Vs. Shivshankar Basappa Lingashetty ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 72 and 72(1)

Reported in : AIR1974Bom40; (1973)75BOMLR523; 1973MhLJ782

Advocate for Appellant : J.R. Lalit, Adv. for ;U.R. Lalit, Adv.

1. These appeals arise out of the original proceedings before the Deputy Charity Commissioner holding enquiry under the Bombay Public Trustee Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') to determine whether there was a public the...

(Sou) Narayandevi Tulshiram Pallod and ors. Vs. Dattatraya Maruti Bawa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Reported in : (1993)95BOMLR129

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Applicants in Civil Application No. 1997 of 1993 seek leave to be added as respondents to the writ petition which was already disposed of, whereas the same applicants by Civil Application No. 1996...

Shantabai Vishnumal Vs. Ganpat Ladha and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11) and 12(2)

Reported in : AIR1976Bom288; 1976MhLJ332

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Jha, Adv.

Mukhi, J. 1. This petition has been referred to a Division Bench because along with other pontes it involves a question of public importance.2. That question is whether in the case of tenancies of business premises...

Dinkar S. Vaidya Vs. Ganpat S. Gore and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(3), 5(11), 6, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(3), 15-A and 28; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 105, 108 and 114; Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 60; Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control (Amendment) Ordinance, 1959

Reported in : AIR1981Bom190

Advocate for Appellant : H.G. Advani and;M.A. Rane, Advs.

ORDER1. This is an unfortunatepiece of litigation. The petitioner before me was the plaintiff in the trial Court. He got a decree for possession in his favour. The decree was set aside by the appellate Court....

Shripatrao Vinayakrao Patwardhan and ors. Vs. Sharatchandra Nilkanth P ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 17 and 54 - Order 20, Rule 12(1); Bombay Merged Territories Miscellaneous Alienation Abolition Act, 1955 - Sections 4 and 7; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32G; Bombay Rent-free Estates Act, 1852; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagir Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3 and 5; Bombay Rent-free Estates Rules - Rule 10; Hindu Law

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR619

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Paranjpe and ;P.M. Pradhan, Advs.

M.L. Pendse, J.1. This second appeal is preferred by original defendants Nos. 3 to 7 and 11 to 14 to challenge the legally of the judgment dated August 12, 1974 recorded by the District Judge, Sangli...