Advanced Search Results

Suleman Usman Memon Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1961CriLJ78

ORDERBhagwati, J.1. The short and interesting question' which arises in this Criminal Revision Application is as regards the weight to be attached to a report of a Chemical Examiner when the report is tender ed as...

Mrs. Tarabai Lalji Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : (1980)21GLR15

B.K. Mehta, J.1. In this group of Civil Applications, the petitioner-Mrs. Tarabai Lalji, who was plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 25 of 1968 on the file of the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.) Jamnagar, being suit...

Gulabchand Zaverchand Mehta Vs. (Patel) Kurji Bhagwanji Kalaria

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1962Guj229; (1962)0GLR113

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Shah, Adv.

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. This Second Appeal raises a short question regarding the validity of the notice to quit given by the plaintiff to the defendant. It is an admitted fact that the tenancy of the defendant...

Bhanshali Kushalchand Ramji and anr. Vs. Sha Shamji Jivraj and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Housing Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 2(11), 5(3) and 12; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 76 and 111; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949; Bihar Tenancy Act

Reported in : AIR1958Bom53; (1957)59BOMLR684; ILR1957Bom582

Advocate for Appellant : M.U. Shah, Adv.

ORDERThis revision application under paragraph 35 of the Kutch Province (Courts) Order, 1948, arises out of a suit for partition. The only question falling for consideration is whether the applicant-plaintiffs are entitled to recover actual possession...

Ayer Ravji Vasta Vs. Joshi Gopalji Khimji and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 36, 96, 97 and 103; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 111

Reported in : AIR1963Guj328; (1963)GLR780

Advocate for Appellant : M.U. Shah and; S.M. Shah, Advs.

V.B. Raju, J.1. The facts out of which this appeal arises can be briefly stated as follows : In a redemption suit by 3 mortgagor against the two mortgagees, the appellant, who was 8 tenant of...

Dinoo F. Byramji Vs. Dolly Jahangir Ranji (Mrs.)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(4A)

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR587; 1988MhLJ1078

Advocate for Appellant : M.U. Shah, Adv.

G.H. Guttal, J.1. In this petition, the defendant 'paying guest', challenges the validity of the decree for possession made by the Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes in Appeal No. 201 of 1983, reversing...

Kailash Engineering Co. Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2, 2(8), 6, 8, 9, 27 and 61; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : (1963)GLR726; [1964]15STC574(Guj)

Advocate for Appellant : M.U. Shah, Adv.

Desai, C.J.1. This is a reference purported to have been made under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Our attention has been drawn to the fact that this reference should really have been...

Union of India (Uoi) Owning Western Railway, Bombay Vs. Dayabhai Laxma ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1961; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 151, 152, 161 and 226

Reported in : AIR1962Guj266

Advocate for Appellant : M.U. Shah and; K.R. Bhatt, Advs.

ORDERV.B. Raju, J.1. In Small Cause case No. 348 of 1958, a decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff firm, a consignee of goods, against the Union of India Owning the Western Railway for damages...

P. Satyanarayana Through His Wife P. Mahalakshmi Vs. I. Babu Rajendra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1988)ACC510

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. This appeal raises questions relating to assessment of non-pecuniary damages in cases such as loss of both eyes and severe head injury resulting in total loss of mental faculties. Today the appel-...

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Lakshmi NaraIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 10(2) and 16(1)

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi236

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Raizada,; Jagdeep Kishore,; R.L. Tandon and;

M.R.A. Ansari, J.(1) The Municipal Corporation of Delhi, the appellant herein, filed a complaint against the respondent Lakshmi Narain for an offence under section 16(1)(b) and (c) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter...