Advanced Search Results
Shivshankar Shivram Singh and ors. Vs. Pramila R. Dwivedi and ors.
Mumbai
May-06-1997
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 4 and 4A; Grants-in-aid Code Special Rules - Rules 5, 12, 13, 14 and 21
1997(4)BomCR541
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Respondent No. 1 was appointed as a part-time Craft teacher for the period November 13, 1984 upto April 30, 1985. She was continued as a Part-time teacher upto June 30, 1989. She was,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Jabar Mohammed Ishaq and anr. Vs. Ravindranath Rupa Prajapati an ...
Mumbai
Apr-20-2005
Civil
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2) and 69(2A); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2
2005(3)ALLMR191
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
D.G. Deshpande, J.1. Heard Mr. Pandye . for the appellants. Mr. Thakker with Mr. Reis for Respondent No. 9 and Mr. Shetty for respondent Nos. 1, 3, 7 & 8. The appellants are the original plaintiffs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMethodex Systems (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-08-2008
Direct Taxation
Bombay Rent Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 269U(2), 269UA(2), 269UD, 269UD(1), 269UE, 269UE(1) and 269UE(2); Bombay Rent (Amendment) Act
(2008)215CTR(Bom)409; [2008]301ITR27(Bom)
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
F.I. Rebello, J.1. According to the petitioners by an agreement of 28th Nov., 1969 executed with Mrs. Gopibai Gopaldas they took on leave and licence basis Flat No. 54A on the 5th Floor of the building...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rolex Marbles Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and anr.
Mumbai
Jun-15-2007
Property
Bombay Rent Act
2007(6)ALLMR868; 2007(6)BomCR323; 2007(4)MhLj826
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
Roshan Dalvi, J.1. This Appeal challenges the judgment of the learned Judge of the Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court dated 8th December, 2006. The respondents have appeared and argued in support of the Judgment. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGango Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of G ...
Mumbai
Aug-22-2003
TenancyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 300A; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 5; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888
AIR2004Bom64; 2004(1)ALLMR115; 2004(3)BomCR879
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard learned Advocates for the parties, Perused records. The short point for consideration which arises in the matter is whether the Corporation could have rejected the proposal of the petitioner for utilisation of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYakub Haji Haroon Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-06-1995
Civil
Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 - Sections 18
1996(2)BomCR42; (1996)98BOMLR42
M.U. Pandey, Adv. and ;S.D. Nevatia, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 5437 and 5438 of 1985 and ;B.C. Pradhan, Adv. in W.P. No. 1552 of 1986
S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. Since the petitioners in these writ petitions seek to have the order dated 15th October, 1985 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Bombay in Case No. Appeal/Desk/279 quashed and set aside and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeryl Murzello and ors. Vs. Ramchandra Bhairo Mane and ors.
Mumbai
Mar-15-2007
Civil
Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42 and 43; Code of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12, Rule 6
2007(4)BomCR397; 2007(5)MhLj708
M.U. Pandey, Adv. in Appeal Nos. 1316 and 1317/1998
Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both these appeals, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Both these appeals have been filed against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshish Mines and Minerals and ors. Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-12-2005
Banking
Recovery of Debts Due to the Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19, 20 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1
2005(4)ALLMR825; 2(2007)BC171
M.U. Pandey, Adv.
Dalveer Bhandari, C.J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed in Misc Application No. 489 of 2004 in Appeal No. 182 of 2004, by which the petitioners have been directed to deposit 50% of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›