Advanced Search Results
G.C. Kanungo and D.C. Routray Vs. State of Orissa
Supreme Court of India
May-12-1995
ConstitutionArbitration
Constitution of India - Article 32; Arbitration (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14, 17 and 41-A; Arbitration (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 2, 3 and 42-A; Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1982; Arbitration (Orissa Amendment) Act, 1984; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 47
AIR1995SC1655; 1995(2)ARBLR277(SC); JT1995(4)SC589; 1995(3)SCALE658; (1995)5SCC96; [1995]Supp1SCR510
N. Santosh Hedge,; Vinoo Bhagat,; Yashank Andhyaru,;
ORDERN. Venkatachala, J.1. Question of constitutionality of the Arbitration (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1991, to be referred to hereinafter as the 1991 Amendment Act', which has amended the Arbitration Act, 1940, to be referred to hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mammed Beary
Chennai
Jul-16-1954
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 225B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 24(2)
AIR1955Mad157; 1955CriLJ569
M. Santosh, Adv.
ORDERSomasundaram, J.1. The petitioner in this case has been convicted by the first Class Magistrate, Kasargod for an offence under Section 225-B, I. P. C., andsentenced to three months rigorous imprisonment.In appeal the conviction and sentence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Mysore Vs. Raju Shetty and ors.
Karnataka
Sep-12-1960
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97, 141, 148, 149 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 34, 302, 324, 342 and 423; Evidence Act - Sections 105
AIR1961Kant74; AIR1961Mys74; 1961CriLJ403; ILR1960KAR1126
M. Santosh, High Court Govt. Pleader
1. In respect of an incident which took place at about 8 a.m. on the morning of the 28th of April 1957 at Kuchoor in Arkula village, Manglore Taluk, South Kanara, in front of thehouse of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Vs. Miya Jani
Karnataka
Oct-23-1959
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 236, 237, 342, 364 and 364(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 411
AIR1961Kant158; AIR1961Mys158; 1961CriLJ827
M. Santosh, High Court Govt. Pleader
ORDER1. This is a reference made by the District Magistrale, Raicliur, expressing the view that the conviction of the accused in Criminal Case No. 203/18 of 1958-59 by the Munsiff-Magistrate, Raichur, is unsustainable and recommending that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Mysore Vs. Gurupadappa Appayyappa Kardesai
Karnataka
Sep-16-1960
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 254 and 372; Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1933 - Sections 1, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 58A, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87 and 88; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 1(2), 6, 417 and 417(1); Government of India, 1935 - Sections 107; Mysore Sales Tax Act - Sections 22; Madras Prohibition Act
AIR1961Kant257; AIR1961Mys257
M. Santosh, High Court Government Pleader
Narayana Pai, J.1. The Nyaya Panchayat of Ankalgi village, Gokak Taluk, Balgaum District, constituted under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act of 1933, convicted the respondent Gurupadappa Appayyappa Kardesai of the offence of having contravened one of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmaraja Shetty and ors.
Chennai
Feb-21-1949
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 30, 114 and 133; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300 and 302
AIR1951Mad746
M.K. Nambiar, ;M. Sekhara Menon, ;B. Punyakoti Chetti and ;M. Santosh, Advs.
Subba Rao, J. 1. Accused 1 to 9 are the applts. Accused 1 to 3 were convicted by the Ses J. of South Kanara under Section 302, I. P. C. & under Section 302 read with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCt. (Mah.) Santosh Kumari Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Jan-20-2015
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : January 20, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3702/2014 CT. (MAH.) SANTOSH KUMARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K.Tyagi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.Ashok Vs. 1. the Secretary,
Chennai
Aug-07-2015
Land Acquisition
Mr. Justice M.Jagannadha Rao
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :07. 08.2015 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.P.(MD)No.9533 of 2015 M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2015 B.Ashok .. Petitioner vs.1. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhal Singh Dewangan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Supreme Court of India
Sep-23-2016
Criminal
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S).162-163 of 2014 DHAL SINGH DEWANGAN ..... Appellant Versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH …. Respondent JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.These appeals by special leave challenge...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVanajakshamma and ors. Vs. P. Gopala Krishna
Karnataka
Apr-02-1970
CriminalFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 488 and 489(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 50, 74, 77 and 114; Indian Divorce Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494, 495, 497 and 498; Hindu Law; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 7 and 17
AIR1970Mys305; 1970CriLJ1584
J.M. Riazuddin, Adv.
ORDERM. Santosh, J.1. This petition arises out of proceedings taken under Section 488, Criminal Procedure Code. The 1st petitioner before this Court claims to be the wife of the respondent and the petitioners 2 and 3...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »