Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m s vyas · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.135 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 01 1994

Narottam Paliwal Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Udaipur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-01-1994

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehilces Act, 1988 - Sections 80(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Raj27; 1995(1)WLC95; 1994(2)WLN506

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Vyas, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Palli, J. 1. The petitioner has impugned the resolution of the Regional Authority Udaipur Region, Udaipur (for short called hereinafter as 'the R.T.A.') dated 21-12-1990 (Annex. P.4) and the order of the State Transport Appellate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1998

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State Transport Appella ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-27-1998

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 88; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Rules, 1990 - Rule 5.9

Reported in : AIR1999Raj111; 1999(1)WLC619

Advocate for Appellant : Sangeet Lodha, Adv.; R.P. Dave, Adv.

ORDERB.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant petitions have been filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation thereinafter called 'the Corporation') being aggrieved by the judgment and orders of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal thereinafter called 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 2011

Shri Girish Vyas and anr. Vs. the State of Maharastra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-12-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Town Planning Act 1954 - Section 10; Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Section 6, 11, 12(2), 18, 23(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 80; Public Charitable Trust Act; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 166, 21

1. What is the nature and significance of the planning process for a large Municipal town area? In that process, what is the role of the Municipal Corporation, which is the statutory planning authority? Can the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 07 1994

Mahaveer Textiles Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-07-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A, 16 and 19A

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1057Raj; 1995(2)WLC49

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Kala, Adv.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. The petitioner-establishment has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer that he should be declared to be entitled for infancy period under Section 16...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1996

Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Now Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-1996

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR117

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Dara Zaiwala, ;Sh. Satish Gandhi and ;Sh. S.A. Bhalwal, Advs., i/by., ;M/s. Vyas and ;Bhalwal

Dr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the arbitration petition of the appellant for setting aside the award. 2. The relevant facts of the case,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1982

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Agarwal and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-25-1982

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959

Reported in : 1983LC65D(Bombay); 1983(12)ELT116(Bom); [1983]52STC117(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jetly

Mr. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Respondents Messrs Agarwal & Co. are resellers in tea, coffee and skimmed milk powder. For the period 1-4-1975 to 31-3-1976 the Sales Tax Officer subjected the sales of skimmed milk powder to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1999

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-1999

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 23(1), 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 44, 45, 47, 49, 51, 58, 59 to 112, 125, 126, 127, 128 to 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157 and 158; Constitution of India - Articles 13-010, 19(1), 19-045, 133, 141, 166(3) and 226; Development Control Rules, 1982 - Rules 1.3, 5, 6.1.1 and 13.5; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1931; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12-A, 18 and 54; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 22; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37-I and 269(UA); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 3 to 20, 21 to 58, 159, 253, 254, 255 and 481; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1951 - Sections 1 to 7; Bombay Village Panchayat Act, Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 51 and 52;

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

Advocate for Appellant : Vinod Bobade, Sr. A., ;Vijay A. Thorot, ;Uday Lalit, ;A.A. Kumbhakoni, ;Girish Godbole, ;D.S. Bhonde and ;V.P. Sawant, Advs.

ORDERB.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two petitions are in the nature of public interest litigation, the first at the instance of a journalist from Pune and the second at the instance of a Corporator of Pune Municipal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 1998

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Osprey Underwriting Agencies ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-24-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Ports Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 14; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1, 2 and 12; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959; Companies Act, 1956; Marine Insurance Act, 1906

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR713; 1998(5)BomCR344; (1998)2BOMLR179

Advocate for Appellant : Rafique A. Dada, ;Vivek Diwan, Advs., i/by ;M/s. Vyas & ;Bhalwal, ;K.P. Jain and ;Ramesh Jain, Advs.

ORDERM.S. Rane, J.1. The suit herein has been filed in somewhat peculiar circumstances as will be indicated herein below.2. The plaintiff herein is a statutory body constituted under the Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1959

Vyas Automobiles Vs. Central India Motors and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-1959

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(1) - Order 6, Rule 17; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 22; Partnership Act

Reported in : AIR1959MP425

Advocate for Appellant : K. Gandhe, Adv.

ORDERP.V. Dixit, J.1. This is a petition to revise an order of the civil judge second class, Indore, permitting, the plaintiff non-applicant M/s Central India Motors to amend the plaint in the suit so as to,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2009

Mrs. Jyoti Harshad Mehta and ors. Vs. the Custodian and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-07-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4(1), 9A, 10 and 11; Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; Defence of India Rules

Reported in : JT2009(15)SC124; 2009(11)SCALE62; (2009)10SCC564; [2009]95SCL142(SC); 2009(8)LC3954(SC):2009AIRSCW6858

Advocate for Appellant : I.H. Syed,; Varinder Kumar Sharma,; Kamini Jaiswal,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation and/or application of the provisions of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, (hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as `the Special Act') is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial