Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m s syali · Page 1 of about 240 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 14 1998

Milkfood Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-14-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)65TTJ(Del)848

Advocate for Appellant : M.S Syali,;for the Appellan; R.S. Malik,;for the Responden

ORDERBY THE BENCH:The appeal preferred by the assessed is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) for the assessment year 1989-90.2. The learned counsel of the assessed did not press for the grounds 1 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1998

Sarabjit Singh Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 144B

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)513; 74(1998)DLT448; 1998(46)DRJ446; [1998]234ITR641(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S.Syali, Adv

ORDERD.K.Jain, J. 1. At the instance of the assessee, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal(hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), Delhi Bench 'E', re-ferred to this Court the following question of law pertaining to the as-sessment year 1976-77,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1998

C.S. Mathur Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80RRA

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)550; 1998(45)DRJ450; [1999]235ITR769(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Syali and;Mr Satyen Sethi. Advs

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioner is a chartered accountant engaged in providing professional services to various Indian and foreign clients. Services to foreign clients are provided in terms of the agreement entered into from time to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 27 1999

Mitsui and Company Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)65TTJ(Del)1

Advocate for Appellant : M. S. Syali,;Kapilesh Manglik &; Aseem Chawla,;for the Appellan; B. B. Ahuja &;

ORDERNathu Ram, A.M.These are the appeals preferred by the assessees against the common order of the Commissioner (Appeals) for the financial years 1989-90 to 1994-95 confirming the penalties levied under section 271C of the Income Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2000

Jyotsna Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority Under the Kar Viva ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 87 and 220; Finance Act, 1960 - Sections 156 and 215

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)461; 2000(53)DRJ696; [2000]243ITR246(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate and; Mr. Satyen Sethi, Adv

ORDERD.K. Jain, J.1. Two short but interesting questions namely: (i) whether interest under Section 220(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') forms part of 'tax arrear' as defined in Section 87(m) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1997

Deeksha Suri Vs. Income-tax Appellate Tribunal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-05-1997

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 - Rule 29; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1) and 256(2)

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)912; 73(1998)DLT75; 1998(44)DRJ120; 1998(102)ELT524(Del); [1998]232ITR395(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Sharma,; Anoop Sharma,; M.S. Syali,;

R.C. Lahoti, J. (1) This common order shall govern the disposal of 4 civil writ petitions, namely Cwp 2796/97, Ms.Deeksha Suri v. It at, Cwp 2797/97 Ms.Divya Suri v. It at, Cwp 2798/97 Sh Lalit Suri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2000

Nabha Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-24-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 263

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ256

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali, Senior Adv. and; Manoj Sharma, Adv

D.K. Jain, J. 1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a private limited investment company, impugnes the legality and validity of the notice dated 7th April, 1999...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2000

Commissioner of Income Tax and ors. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Associati ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)207

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey; with Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenu; M.S. Syali;with Satyen Sethi; & Mallikarjun,

D.K. Jain, . J.At the instance of the revenue , the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') has referred the following question under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2002

United Electrical Company P. Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 132, 139, 139(1), 143(2), 147 and 148 to 153

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT146

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali, Sr. Adv.,; Satyen Sethi and; Manu K. Giri,

D.K. Jain, J.1. Rule D.B.2. Since a very short point is involved, with the consent of counsel for the parties we take up the matter for final disposal.3. Challenge in this writ petition under Article 226...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2002

United Electrical Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)178CTR(Del)192

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali and;Satyen Sethi &; Manu K. Giri, for the assessed;

D.K. Jain, J.Rule D.B.2. Since a very short point is involved, with the consent of counsel for the parties we take up the matter for final disposal.3. Challenge in this writ petition under article 226 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial