Advanced Search Results

A. Alwar Nagiah Vs. State Through Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1365

Advocate for Appellant : G. Sankaran, Sr. Counsel for ;M/s M.S. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision is directed against the order passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai in Crl.R.P. No. 42 of 1993 dated 12-10-1993 setting aside the order of discharge passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No....

Rajagopal Pillai and ors. Vs. Pakkiam Ammal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyFamily

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ411

K.S. Ramamurti, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit, Original Suit No. 152 of 1960 filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein for partition and separate possession of their 1/6th share in the properties specified...

K. Srinivasa Iyengar Vs. K. Srinivasan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1973)2SCC327

D.G. PALEKAR, J.1. This is an appeal by the first defendant against the judgment of the High Court of Madras in Appeal No. 491 of 1966 arising out of Original Suit No. 113/1950 on the file...

R. Srinivasan, Vs. Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intellig ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374; Essential Commodities Act; Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act

Reported in : 2003(159)ELT83(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Kumar, Sr. Adv. for ;N. Mohideen Basha, Adv., ;V. Gopinath, Sr. Counsel for ;G. Saravanan, Adv., ;A.A. Selvam, Adv. for ;M.S. Srinivasan, Adv. and ;R. Regupathy, Adv. for ;R. Rajan, Adv.

Malai Subramanian, J.1. All these five appeals arise out of a single Judgment delivered by the Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act & N.D.P.S. Act), Salem in C.C.No.24/94. C.A.No.773/97 has been filed by 10th accused; C.A.No.760/97 has...

State of Maharashtra and Khas Mohamad Basalataill Vs. Prabhatkumar Sha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173, 197, 239, 240 and 207; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21(12), 120B and 511; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 10 and 59; Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 112

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR609

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Kotwal, P.P. in C.R.A. No. 298 of 1984 and ;M.L. Dudhat, Adv. for; Pramod M. Joshi, Adv. in C.R.A. No. 243 of 1984

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. A sinner gets a prick to his conscience, becomes restless and even prays to the Almighty to forgive him for committing sin of falsely involving someone and then knocks the doors of the...

M.S. Madhusoodhanan and anr. Vs. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 2(13), 81, 81(1), 81(2) and 284; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 31(1), 108, 155, 159, 161(2), 164, 189(2), 193, 193(1), 194, 195, 397, 398, 402, 403 and 446; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(10), 4, 9, 8(2), 9(1) and 9(2); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 16, 20 and 20(2); Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 12; Arbitration Act, 1940; Evidence Act - Sections 16 and 114; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28B and 265; Citizenship Rules - Rules 3, 59 and 60; Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 18; Stamps Act

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD1(SC); [2003]117CompCas19(SC); (2003)4CompLJ185(SC); 2003(6)SCALE191; (2004)9SCC204; [2003]46SCL695(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.T.M. Rangaramanujan, Sr. Adv.,; Gopal Jain,; Prateek Jalan

Ruma Pal, J.1. An internecine dispute between the members of a family relating to the controlling interests in companies has given rise to the nine appeals which are being disposed of by this judgment. Given the...

Shiv Sagar Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 73 and 309; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 7; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971 - Rules 2 and 8; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1965 - Rule 15A

Reported in : AIR1997SC2725; 1997(1)BLJR110; 1996(9)SCALE680; (1997)1SCC444; [1996]Supp10SCR925

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Kumar,; M.L. Jain,; G.L. Sanghi. Altaf Ahmed and;

ORDERHansaria, J.1. The administrative law has of late seen vast increase in discretionary powers. But then, the discretion conferred has to be exercised to advance the purpose to subserve which the power exists. Even the Minister,...

D. Boopalan and ors. Vs. Madras Metropolitan W.S.S. Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1978 - Sections 81 and 81(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309; Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Employees (Leave) Regulations, 1978 - Regulation 9; Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Employees (Leave) (Amendment) Regulations, 1993 - Regulation 9; Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Employees (Leave) (Amendment) Regulations, 1995

Reported in : 2007(12)SCALE781; 2008(2)SLJ149(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : T.L.V. Iyer, Sr. Adv. and; T. Raja, Adv

ORDERSd/- M.S. Srinivasan,Mg. Director.6. The aforesaid amendments were subsequently altered by the Board on 10th March, 1995 whereby some of the benefits which had been extended to the employees of the Board having a graduate Degree...

Bank of India Vs. Luk Auto Ancillary (India) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : BankingCommercial

Acts : Banks and Financial Institution Act, 1993 - Sections 17(1), 18, 31(1) and 34; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 442, 537 and 446; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; RDB Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18 and 31

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas436(Delhi); 2000(54)DRJ393

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Valmiki Mehta, Adv

ORDERJ.B. Goel, J.1. Plaintiff, Bank of India had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 2475045.02 against four defendants namely, (1) M/s Luk Auto Ancillary (India) Ltd., (2) L.N. Raina, (3) Vijay Kumar Mundhra and (4)...

K.S. Mohan Vs. Sandhya Mohan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 - Sections 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1993Mad59

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.L. Somayaji, Adv., for;M/s. Srinivasan and;V. Sudhkar

ORDER1. The above Original Petition is filed by the husband against his wife to direct his wife to hand over custody of the minor son Skanda, who is now aged about four years, under the following...