Advanced Search Results

Union of India Vs. Himachal Futuristic Communications Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Ms. Swati Sinha, Mr. Ashish Virmani, Mr. Mohit Garg, Mr. B.V. Niren, Mr. Prasouk Jain

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI F-138 + OMP No. 127 of 2008 UNION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Additional Solicitor General with Ms. Swati Sinha, Mr. Ashish Virmani,...

M/s Ray Constructions Ltd., Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100018/2015 BETWEEN1 M/S RAY CONSTRUCTIONS LTD., A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED...

Lunkaran Agarwala Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 42, 42(1), 112 and 123

Reported in : AIR1959Ori50; 1959CriLJ358

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Ray and ;B. Misra, Advs.

ORDERR.L. Narasimham, C.J. 1. This is a petition, in revision, against the appellate judgment of the Sessions Judge of Cuttack Dhenkanal maintaining the conviction of the petitioner under Sections 112 and 123 of the Motor Vehicles...

Cce Vs. Ray Ban Sun Optics India Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2003)(86)ECC172

1. In these two appeals, filed by the Revenue, the issue involved is whether M/s. Ray Ban Sun Optics India Ltd. are liable to pay an amount equivalent to 8% of the price of the exempted...

Aidqua Holding (Mauritius) Inc. Vs. Tamil Nadu Water Investmant

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2008)142CompCas497

1. In the company petition filed under Sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act") at the instance of the petitioners/respondents collectively holding 47.32% of the issued, subscribed and paid up...

Director-general of Vs. Warisi Sales Corporation

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Subject : MRTP

1. This is an application under Section 12A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, praying that the respondent, M/s. Warisi Sales Corporation, Guwahati, be restrained by an interim injunction from indulging in the...

Goldcrest Finance (India) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Mum.)926

1. This appeal by the assessee is against the order of Dy. CIT, Spl.Range-32 Mumbai dt. 29th Oct. 1997 for the block assessment 1987-88 to 1997-98 (upto 19th July, 1996) against the order under Section 158BC...

Bharati Cellular Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jai Distillers P. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 11 and 12; Copy Rights Act - Sections 14, 51 and 55; Trademark Act, 1999; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2007Bom33; 2006(4)BomCR280; 2006(33)PTC220(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virag Tulzapurkar, ;Amit Jamsandekar, ;Sindhu Shrivastav and ;Neha Phatak, Advs., i/b., D.H. Law and Associates

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. The present notice of Motion has been taken out inter alia seeking relief of injunction of infringement of the plaintiffs artistic work being Exhibit-D to the plaint and also for an injunction from...

Natural Sugar and Allied Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Razzak S/O Hazi ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 11, 24, 25, 34, 155, 177, 179, 190, 193, 406, 409, 415 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 178, 181(4), 182(1), 184, 184(4), 223 and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 202

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3680; 2006(4)MhLj771

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. Shri M. M. Agnihotri, learned Counsel waives notices on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and Shri K. S. Dhote,...

Smt. Kamalarani Ray Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Orissa

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 84 and 79; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 and 80; Gold (Control) Rules

Reported in : 69(1990)CLT450; 1990(25)ECC259; 1990(49)ELT52(Ori)

Advocate for Appellant : A. Mukherjee, ;A.K. Misra, ;M.S. Ray and ;K. Patnaik, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Plaintiff is the appellant having failed to get a direction for return of the gold seized by the defendants in exercise of powers under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as...