Advanced Search Results
Mspl Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Sep-25-2008
Service Tax
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 68(2), 75, 76, 77 and 78; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1); Factories Act, 1948; Companies Act, 1956; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Central Excise Act, 1944
[2009]16STJ252(CESTAT-Bangalore); 2009[13]S.T.R.554; [2009]20STT384
M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDERT.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)1. This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 207/2007-CE dated 13.12.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore.2. Mr M.S. Nagaraj, the learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Industries Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-05-2007
Excise
(2007)(117)ECC385
1. This appeal has been filed against the Orders-in-Appeal No. 67 & 68/2003 (H-II) CE dated 06.11.2003, passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad.2. The appellants are the manufacturers of Air Conditioners,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS Murali vs State by Central Bureau of
Karnataka
Jun-27-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1049 OF 2012 (C) BETWEEN: S. MURALI S/O. LDR G....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.S. Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jul-23-2004
Service Tax
(2004)(97)ECC660
1. A Show Cause Notice was issued to M/s R.S. Electronics Ltd. on the ground that concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 13/97-Cus dated 1.3.97 and Notification No. 25/99-Cus dated 28.2.99 is available only if...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecot Mills Ltd., K-unit Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Dec-08-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(183)ELT407Tri(Bang.)
1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Original No 1/2004 dated 16.1.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Bangalore-I Commissionerate, Bangalore.2. The appellants are manufactures of Poly (dyed) yarn, an excisable commodity. They...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Central Tax vs P J B Engineers Pvt Ltd
Karnataka
Jan-08-2026
Sri. Akash B. Shetty
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No. 12 OF 2021...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Kumara Nayak S/O Thangamuthu Vs. H Nagaruju S/O H Halegowda
Karnataka
Jan-28-2015
Land Acquisition
1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015, : BEFORE : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL M.F.A.No.6134 OF2009(MV) Between: Sri. Kumara Nayak, S/o. Thangamuthu, Aged about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnaswamy Vs. Cauvery Grameena Bank, Mysore and Another
Karnataka
Jul-04-1997
Service
Cauvery Grammeena Bank Staff Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 17, 19 and 30(1); Constitution of India -Article 226
ILR1998KAR1047; 1998(4)KarLJ350
Sri Appanna for Sri Dr. M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDER1. The matter is posted in Preliminary Hearing 'B' group. By consent of the learned Counsels for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. While working as a clerk in the Cauvery Grameena...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. R. Srinivasan Vs. Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Develo ...
Karnataka
Mar-19-1987
Service
Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limited Service Rules, 1977 - Rules 14, 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 14
ILR1987KAR2567
M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for a declaration that the communications bearing No. Secy. & AO 12792/83-84 dated 17-3-1984 (Annexure-K) & No. Per ADMN/1297/83-84...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjunath Vs. Divisional Commissioner
Karnataka
Nov-08-1993
Commercial
Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 9, 16 and 17; Karnataka Cinema (Regulation) Rules, 1971 - Rule 85
ILR1993KAR3561
Jayakumar S. Patil, Adv.
ORDERA.J. Sadashiva, J. 1. Though the Petitions are listed for orders, by consent of both the Counsel for the parties, the Petitions are taken up for final hearing. Whether the District Magistrate is empowered to transfer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »