Advanced Search Results
Mspl Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Sep-25-2008
Service Tax
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 68(2), 75, 76, 77 and 78; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1); Factories Act, 1948; Companies Act, 1956; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Central Excise Act, 1944
[2009]16STJ252(CESTAT-Bangalore); 2009[13]S.T.R.554; [2009]20STT384
M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDERT.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)1. This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 207/2007-CE dated 13.12.2007 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore.2. Mr M.S. Nagaraj, the learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Industries Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-05-2007
Excise
(2007)(117)ECC385
1. This appeal has been filed against the Orders-in-Appeal No. 67 & 68/2003 (H-II) CE dated 06.11.2003, passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad.2. The appellants are the manufacturers of Air Conditioners,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.S. Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jul-23-2004
Service Tax
(2004)(97)ECC660
1. A Show Cause Notice was issued to M/s R.S. Electronics Ltd. on the ground that concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 13/97-Cus dated 1.3.97 and Notification No. 25/99-Cus dated 28.2.99 is available only if...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Precot Mills Ltd., K-unit Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Dec-08-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(183)ELT407Tri(Bang.)
1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Original No 1/2004 dated 16.1.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Bangalore-I Commissionerate, Bangalore.2. The appellants are manufactures of Poly (dyed) yarn, an excisable commodity. They...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Kumara Nayak S/O Thangamuthu Vs. H Nagaruju S/O H Halegowda
Karnataka
Jan-28-2015
Land Acquisition
1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JANUARY, 2015, : BEFORE : THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL M.F.A.No.6134 OF2009(MV) Between: Sri. Kumara Nayak, S/o. Thangamuthu, Aged about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. R. Srinivasan Vs. Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Develo ...
Karnataka
Mar-19-1987
Service
Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation Limited Service Rules, 1977 - Rules 14, 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 14
ILR1987KAR2567
M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has sought for a declaration that the communications bearing No. Secy. & AO 12792/83-84 dated 17-3-1984 (Annexure-K) & No. Per ADMN/1297/83-84...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishnaswamy Vs. Cauvery Grameena Bank, Mysore and Another
Karnataka
Jul-04-1997
Service
Cauvery Grammeena Bank Staff Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 17, 19 and 30(1); Constitution of India -Article 226
ILR1998KAR1047; 1998(4)KarLJ350
Sri Appanna for Sri Dr. M.S. Nagaraj, Adv.
ORDER1. The matter is posted in Preliminary Hearing 'B' group. By consent of the learned Counsels for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. While working as a clerk in the Cauvery Grameena...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.V. Kamath S/O Late V. Keshav Vaman Kamath Vs. Assistant General Mana ...
Karnataka
Sep-22-2006
Service
Bank of Baroda Officer Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2006(6)KarLJ696; (2007)ILLJ954Kant
M.S. Nagaraj, Adv. for M.S. Nagaraj Associates
ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The facts of the case are:The petitioner was appointed as a clerk with the respondent bank on 10.4.1964 and was confirmed on 9.3.1965. It is the petitioner's case that he has rendered 35...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJsw Steel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
May-10-2010
Service Tax
Shri M.S.Nagaraj, Advocate. Shri V.V.Hariharan, JCDR.
Per Jyoti Balasundaram For the reasons recorded below, we waived predeposit of duty of Rs.57,98,690/- and penalty of equal amount and proceeded to hear and decide the appeal itself at this stage, with the consent of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMiss. Annie Abraham and Others Etc. Vs. the Sarvajna Education Society ...
Karnataka
Apr-20-1990
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 41, 166 and 226; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 28 and 53(10);
AIR1991Kant148; ILR1990KAR1553; 1990(2)KarLJ38
M.S. Nagaraj, ;B. Veerabhadrappa, ;M. Sivappa and ;H.R. Venkataramanaiah, Advs.
ORDER1. Since all these writ petitions involve common questions of law and facts, they are clubbed together and disposed of by a common order.2. The petitioners in Writ Petitions Nos. 13470 to 13483 of 1989 are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »